AI-Driven Hybrid Leadership in Health Care

<p>Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is transforming healthcare leadership by shifting decision-making from hierarchical control to hybrid human–AI collaboration. This study investigates how senior healthcare and information technology (IT) executives adopt, trust, and govern GenAI within complex decision environments where algorithmic systems influence authority, accountability, and ethical oversight. The study used a mixed-methods design, combining quantitative survey data from <span style="color: rgb(1, 0, 0);">319</span> healthcare and IT leaders with 27 semi-structured executive interviews. Statistical analyses, including ANOVA (analysis of variance), regression, and factor analysis, examined relationships among digital literacy, ethical governance, and organizational trust, while thematic analysis explored leaders’ perceptions of GenAI’s agency in decision-making. Findings indicate that GenAI functions as an agentic collaborator, shaping how leaders frame problems and justify decisions. Adoption is highest among digitally fluent, mid-career executives in organizations with formal AI ethics frameworks. Trust remains conditional, depending on explainability, bias auditing, and human oversight. Ethical governance—anchored in ethics boards, explainability dashboards, and multidisciplinary review—emerges as the strongest determinant of organizational legitimacy. The study advances a hybrid-intelligence leadership model, extending transformational, complexity, and ethical leadership theories to reflect distributed authority between human and algorithmic actors. Practically, it calls for institutionalizing AI governance, expanding executive digital literacy, and embedding participatory oversight mechanisms across health systems. GenAI’s success in health care will depend less on its technical sophistication than on leaders’ capacity to govern its agency responsibly, ensuring that algorithmic innovation reinforces fairness, transparency, and trust in human-centered care. </p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Health Wellness and Society
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18848/2156-8960/cgp/a459
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-Driven Hybrid Leadership in Health Care

Ajmal Aminee
The International Journal of Health Wellness and Society
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

AI-Driven Hybrid Leadership in Health Care

Ajmal Aminee
article en

Abstract

<p>Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is transforming healthcare leadership by shifting decision-making from hierarchical control to hybrid human–AI collaboration. This study investigates how senior healthcare and information technology (IT) executives adopt, trust, and govern GenAI within complex decision environments where algorithmic systems influence authority, accountability, and ethical oversight. The study used a mixed-methods design, combining quantitative survey data from <span style="color: rgb(1, 0, 0);">319</span> healthcare and IT leaders with 27 semi-structured executive interviews. Statistical analyses, including ANOVA (analysis of variance), regression, and factor analysis, examined relationships among digital literacy, ethical governance, and organizational trust, while thematic analysis explored leaders’ perceptions of GenAI’s agency in decision-making. Findings indicate that GenAI functions as an agentic collaborator, shaping how leaders frame problems and justify decisions. Adoption is highest among digitally fluent, mid-career executives in organizations with formal AI ethics frameworks. Trust remains conditional, depending on explainability, bias auditing, and human oversight. Ethical governance—anchored in ethics boards, explainability dashboards, and multidisciplinary review—emerges as the strongest determinant of organizational legitimacy. The study advances a hybrid-intelligence leadership model, extending transformational, complexity, and ethical leadership theories to reflect distributed authority between human and algorithmic actors. Practically, it calls for institutionalizing AI governance, expanding executive digital literacy, and embedding participatory oversight mechanisms across health systems. GenAI’s success in health care will depend less on its technical sophistication than on leaders’ capacity to govern its agency responsibly, ensuring that algorithmic innovation reinforces fairness, transparency, and trust in human-centered care. </p>

The International Journal of Health Wellness and Society
Technical Solutions (United States) (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.