0818 Electrocardiographic Age and Ambulatory Blood Pressure in the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study

Abstract Introduction Deep learning–predicted electrocardiographic age (ECG-age), captures biological aging of the heart and predicts cardiovascular events beyond traditional risk factors. Whether ECG-age reflects 24-hour hemodynamic and autonomic burden, specifically ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and heart rate (HR), remains unclear. Because ABP—especially nocturnal BP—is a strong marker of vascular and autonomic dysregulation, examining its relationship with ECG-age may clarify whether ECG-derived biological aging mirrors daily cardiovascular load. Methods We analyzed 781 adults (mean age 60 ± 7 years; 53.1% female) from the KoGES Ansan–Anseong cohort with valid resting ECGs and 24-hour ABP monitoring. ECG-age was estimated using a validated deep neural network trained on >1.5 million ECGs. The difference between ECG-age and chronological age (Δage) was evaluated as a continuous measure and as decelerated vs accelerated aging groups. ABP was recorded every 30 minutes (daytime) and 60 minutes (nighttime). Mean 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime systolic (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP), and HR were computed. Associations between ABP/HR and ECG-age were assessed using multivariable linear regression adjusting for age, sex, BMI, diabetes, and prevalent cardiovascular disease. Sensitivity analyses excluded participants with CVD. Results Higher ECG-age was significantly associated with elevated 24-hour ABP and HR. Each 1 mmHg increase in mean SBP corresponded to 0.038 years higher ECG-age (95% CI 0.009–0.067). Each 1 mmHg increase in mean DBP corresponded to 0.076 years higher ECG-age (95% CI 0.040–0.113). Associations were consistent across daytime and nighttime periods, with similar effect sizes. Mean ambulatory HR was also positively associated with ECG-age (β = 0.070 years per bpm, 95% CI 0.033–0.108). In logistic models, DBP and HR significantly predicted accelerated aging status, whereas SBP did not. Sensitivity analyses excluding cardiovascular disease cases yielded comparable results, confirming robustness. Conclusion ECG-age, a deep learning–derived marker of electrophysiologic aging, is independently associated with higher 24-hour blood pressure and heart rate. These findings indicate that ECG-age reflects cumulative vascular and autonomic stress across the circadian cycle and may serve as a scalable biomarker of early cardiovascular aging relevant to sleep and cardiometabolic physiology. Support (if any)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.0817
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

0818 Electrocardiographic Age and Ambulatory Blood Pressure in the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study

Chol Shin, Seung Ku Lee, Ali Tanweer Siddiquee, Nan Hee Kim et al.
SLEEP
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

0818 Electrocardiographic Age and Ambulatory Blood Pressure in the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study

Chol Shin, Seung Ku Lee, Ali Tanweer Siddiquee, Nan Hee Kim, Nolberto Hernandez, ALLYSON HUGHES, Robert Thomas, Honghuang Lin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Deep learning–predicted electrocardiographic age (ECG-age), captures biological aging of the heart and predicts cardiovascular events beyond traditional risk factors. Whether ECG-age reflects 24-hour hemodynamic and autonomic burden, specifically ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and heart rate (HR), remains unclear. Because ABP—especially nocturnal BP—is a strong marker of vascular and autonomic dysregulation, examining its relationship with ECG-age may clarify whether ECG-derived biological aging mirrors daily cardiovascular load. Methods We analyzed 781 adults (mean age 60 ± 7 years; 53.1% female) from the KoGES Ansan–Anseong cohort with valid resting ECGs and 24-hour ABP monitoring. ECG-age was estimated using a validated deep neural network trained on >1.5 million ECGs. The difference between ECG-age and chronological age (Δage) was evaluated as a continuous measure and as decelerated vs accelerated aging groups. ABP was recorded every 30 minutes (daytime) and 60 minutes (nighttime). Mean 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime systolic (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP), and HR were computed. Associations between ABP/HR and ECG-age were assessed using multivariable linear regression adjusting for age, sex, BMI, diabetes, and prevalent cardiovascular disease. Sensitivity analyses excluded participants with CVD. Results Higher ECG-age was significantly associated with elevated 24-hour ABP and HR. Each 1 mmHg increase in mean SBP corresponded to 0.038 years higher ECG-age (95% CI 0.009–0.067). Each 1 mmHg increase in mean DBP corresponded to 0.076 years higher ECG-age (95% CI 0.040–0.113). Associations were consistent across daytime and nighttime periods, with similar effect sizes. Mean ambulatory HR was also positively associated with ECG-age (β = 0.070 years per bpm, 95% CI 0.033–0.108). In logistic models, DBP and HR significantly predicted accelerated aging status, whereas SBP did not. Sensitivity analyses excluding cardiovascular disease cases yielded comparable results, confirming robustness. Conclusion ECG-age, a deep learning–derived marker of electrophysiologic aging, is independently associated with higher 24-hour blood pressure and heart rate. These findings indicate that ECG-age reflects cumulative vascular and autonomic stress across the circadian cycle and may serve as a scalable biomarker of early cardiovascular aging relevant to sleep and cardiometabolic physiology. Support (if any)

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
Genome Research Foundation (KR), Hadassah Medical Center (IL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.