0728 Impact of Narcolepsy Type 1 on Quality of Life, Employment, and Socioeconomic Burden: Results from a US Cross-Sectional Survey

Abstract Introduction Narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) is a chronic neurological disorder of hypersomnolence, characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), cataplexy, disrupted nighttime sleep, hallucinations, sleep paralysis, and cognitive symptoms. NT1 can negatively affect multiple aspects of life (education, work participation, family, quality of life). Large-scale burden of illness studies in NT1, related to disease severity, are lacking. This study examined the impact on various life domains across the spectrum of disease severity among people with NT1 in the US. Methods Cross-sectional online survey of people with NT1, narcolepsy type 2, or idiopathic hypersomnia was conducted in the US. Participants were recruited from clinical sites, patient panels, and patient associations. Questions covered demographics, symptoms, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), 5-level EQ-5D (mapped to health utilities using a US tariff), education, and employment. NT1 group findings are reported here. Results Overall, 247 participants (female: 74.9%) with NT1, median (IQR) age 40 (31—49) years, were recruited. Median (IQR) ESS total score, 16 (12—19), indicated severe EDS. Comorbidities included back pain (56.2%), anxiety (55.7%), depression (53.1%), and headache (44.3%). Participants (87.2%) had taken narcolepsy medication in the past 30 days. Overall, mean (SD) EQ-5D utility score was 0.61 (0.30); for lower normal daytime sleepiness (ESS 0—5): 0.64 (0.29) and for severe EDS (ESS 16—24): 0.53 (0.32). Overall, 45.3% had a university degree (37.5%, ESS 0—5; 41.9%, ESS 16—24) and 55.3% were employed (75.0%, ESS 0—5; 47.2%, ESS 16—24), of whom 81.5% reported work disruption due to NT1: 50.0% (ESS 0—5); 40.7% (ESS 16—24). Primary reasons for work disruption were fatigue (89.1%), sleepiness (87.3%), and difficulty concentrating (73.6%). In the past 3 months, 35.6% of those employed took sick leave because of their narcolepsy (25.0%, ESS 0—5; 22.8%, ESS 16—24). Of those unemployed, 45.9% received disability benefits. Overall, 57.0% required caregiver assistance. Conclusion Despite current management, NT1 imposes substantial burden beyond clinical outcomes, limiting work capacity and increasing reliance on informal caregivers and disability benefits. Improved treatment efficacy has the potential to improve overall functioning and quality of life. Support (if any) Study was funded by Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. Medical writing was funded by Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.0727
Primary Topic
Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

0728 Impact of Narcolepsy Type 1 on Quality of Life, Employment, and Socioeconomic Burden: Results from a US Cross-Sectional Survey

Nathaniel Watson, Anne Morse, Stephen Crawford, Maureen Watt et al.
SLEEP
Sleep and Wakefulness Research
article

0728 Impact of Narcolepsy Type 1 on Quality of Life, Employment, and Socioeconomic Burden: Results from a US Cross-Sectional Survey

Nathaniel Watson, Anne Morse, Stephen Crawford, Maureen Watt, Linus Jönsson, Amy Duhig, Christine Ulbricht, Tara Lavelle
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) is a chronic neurological disorder of hypersomnolence, characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), cataplexy, disrupted nighttime sleep, hallucinations, sleep paralysis, and cognitive symptoms. NT1 can negatively affect multiple aspects of life (education, work participation, family, quality of life). Large-scale burden of illness studies in NT1, related to disease severity, are lacking. This study examined the impact on various life domains across the spectrum of disease severity among people with NT1 in the US. Methods Cross-sectional online survey of people with NT1, narcolepsy type 2, or idiopathic hypersomnia was conducted in the US. Participants were recruited from clinical sites, patient panels, and patient associations. Questions covered demographics, symptoms, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), 5-level EQ-5D (mapped to health utilities using a US tariff), education, and employment. NT1 group findings are reported here. Results Overall, 247 participants (female: 74.9%) with NT1, median (IQR) age 40 (31—49) years, were recruited. Median (IQR) ESS total score, 16 (12—19), indicated severe EDS. Comorbidities included back pain (56.2%), anxiety (55.7%), depression (53.1%), and headache (44.3%). Participants (87.2%) had taken narcolepsy medication in the past 30 days. Overall, mean (SD) EQ-5D utility score was 0.61 (0.30); for lower normal daytime sleepiness (ESS 0—5): 0.64 (0.29) and for severe EDS (ESS 16—24): 0.53 (0.32). Overall, 45.3% had a university degree (37.5%, ESS 0—5; 41.9%, ESS 16—24) and 55.3% were employed (75.0%, ESS 0—5; 47.2%, ESS 16—24), of whom 81.5% reported work disruption due to NT1: 50.0% (ESS 0—5); 40.7% (ESS 16—24). Primary reasons for work disruption were fatigue (89.1%), sleepiness (87.3%), and difficulty concentrating (73.6%). In the past 3 months, 35.6% of those employed took sick leave because of their narcolepsy (25.0%, ESS 0—5; 22.8%, ESS 16—24). Of those unemployed, 45.9% received disability benefits. Overall, 57.0% required caregiver assistance. Conclusion Despite current management, NT1 imposes substantial burden beyond clinical outcomes, limiting work capacity and increasing reliance on informal caregivers and disability benefits. Improved treatment efficacy has the potential to improve overall functioning and quality of life. Support (if any) Study was funded by Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. Medical writing was funded by Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
Tufts University (US), Tufts Medical Center (US), Geisinger Medical Center (US), University of Washington (US), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Takeda (United States) (US), Takeda (Japan) (JP)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Sleep and Wakefulness Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.