0087 Characterization of REM Alpha and Theta Bursts Activity Across a Night of Sleep and Intra-Individual Reliability

Abstract Introduction REM sleep is critical for health and cognitive functioning. Recent studies have identified electrophysiological REM burst events (REM bursts) in theta (4-8Hz) and alpha (8-16Hz) frequency bands associated with cognitive performance, suggesting REM bursts as neural markers of cognitive processes. Still, intra-individual characteristics of REM bursts are unknown. Here, we conducted an in-depth analysis of REM burst events across the night and examined their intra-subject reliability across four nights of sleep. Methods 86 healthy young adults (67F; 18-35 years) slept in-lab for four nights with polysomnography. A validated REM burst detection algorithm was used to identify EEG theta and alpha bursts. Using linear mixed models, we examined burst features (count, power, duration, density) across four quartiles of sleep and relations between time in REM and bursts in each night. We also calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for burst features and REM minutes across four nights of sleep per subject. Results Both REM theta and alpha burst count increased across each quartile, but burst power decreased over the night. Alpha burst density was lowest during quartile 1 compared with the rest of the night. Theta burst duration increased from quartile 1 and 2 to 3 and 4, while alpha burst duration did not vary. REM minutes positively predicted count and density measures, but negatively predicted power and duration measures. Exclusively in quartiles 1 and 2, REM minutes positively predicted alpha burst density and negatively predicted alpha burst power, indicating potential change in REM physiology from early to late night. Intraclass correlations from alpha and theta bursts showed that power and duration are highly reliable within-subject (ICC≈0.9), while counts, density, and REM minutes are moderately reliable (ICC≈0.5), showing similar levels of reliability levels as non-REM sleep spindles. Conclusion REM bursts were shorter, higher in power, and negatively correlated with the amount of REM sleep in the first half of night, while density increased across the night. We also identified burst features as trait-like, with intra-individual reliability comparable to existing spindles results. These results may provide foundational knowledge for studying REM bursts as neural markers of REM functions. Support (if any) RF1AG061355 (Baker/Mednick). K08HD107161 (Simon).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.0087
Primary Topic
Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

0087 Characterization of REM Alpha and Theta Bursts Activity Across a Night of Sleep and Intra-Individual Reliability

Yunke Chen, J Zhang, Temilade Adekoya, Tracy Uzoigwe et al.
SLEEP
Sleep and Wakefulness Research
article

0087 Characterization of REM Alpha and Theta Bursts Activity Across a Night of Sleep and Intra-Individual Reliability

Yunke Chen, J Zhang, Temilade Adekoya, Tracy Uzoigwe, Sara Mednick, Allison Morehouse, Katharine Simon, Negin Sattari, Alessandra Shuster, Fiona Baker
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction REM sleep is critical for health and cognitive functioning. Recent studies have identified electrophysiological REM burst events (REM bursts) in theta (4-8Hz) and alpha (8-16Hz) frequency bands associated with cognitive performance, suggesting REM bursts as neural markers of cognitive processes. Still, intra-individual characteristics of REM bursts are unknown. Here, we conducted an in-depth analysis of REM burst events across the night and examined their intra-subject reliability across four nights of sleep. Methods 86 healthy young adults (67F; 18-35 years) slept in-lab for four nights with polysomnography. A validated REM burst detection algorithm was used to identify EEG theta and alpha bursts. Using linear mixed models, we examined burst features (count, power, duration, density) across four quartiles of sleep and relations between time in REM and bursts in each night. We also calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for burst features and REM minutes across four nights of sleep per subject. Results Both REM theta and alpha burst count increased across each quartile, but burst power decreased over the night. Alpha burst density was lowest during quartile 1 compared with the rest of the night. Theta burst duration increased from quartile 1 and 2 to 3 and 4, while alpha burst duration did not vary. REM minutes positively predicted count and density measures, but negatively predicted power and duration measures. Exclusively in quartiles 1 and 2, REM minutes positively predicted alpha burst density and negatively predicted alpha burst power, indicating potential change in REM physiology from early to late night. Intraclass correlations from alpha and theta bursts showed that power and duration are highly reliable within-subject (ICC≈0.9), while counts, density, and REM minutes are moderately reliable (ICC≈0.5), showing similar levels of reliability levels as non-REM sleep spindles. Conclusion REM bursts were shorter, higher in power, and negatively correlated with the amount of REM sleep in the first half of night, while density increased across the night. We also identified burst features as trait-like, with intra-individual reliability comparable to existing spindles results. These results may provide foundational knowledge for studying REM bursts as neural markers of REM functions. Support (if any) RF1AG061355 (Baker/Mednick). K08HD107161 (Simon).

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
SRI International (US), Harvard University (US), University of California, Irvine (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Sleep and Wakefulness Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.