Piloting an ICU follow-up clinic — qualitative process evaluation alongside a feasibility study

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have not demonstrated sufficient effects of intensive care unit (ICU) follow-up clinics on health-related quality of life. This may also be influenced by the design and implementation of these studies. Feasibility and context of such studies have yet to be sufficiently researched. It is therefore crucial to investigate these contextual factors. This study aimed to explore the experiences of patients, relatives, and healthcare professionals with both the randomised controlled trial (RCT) and the ICU follow-up clinic, to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and the study design from the perspectives of those involved. METHODS: This qualitative research was embedded in the process evaluation of a pilot RCT on an ICU follow-up clinic. We conducted 18 semi-structured interviews with former ICU patients, relatives and the clinical study team who participated in the PINA study and used field notes from the clinical study team. Data analysis was carried out using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: The pilot RCT was well received by potential patients and their relatives, and the motivation to participate was high, as was the motivation of the clinical study team. The main benefits of the ICU follow-up clinic intervention named by participants were being taken seriously and receiving referrals that they would not typically get from a general practitioner. The offer of home visits for patients with long travel distances to the ICU follow-up clinic was highly appreciated. CONCLUSIONS: It was feasible to integrate the perspectives of patients, relatives, and healthcare professionals within a pilot RCT on an ICU follow-up clinic. Across all stakeholder groups, the ICU follow-up clinic and the RCT trial design were considered acceptable and valuable, suggesting that such follow-up care meets patient needs and that a large-scale study appears feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov US NLM, NCT04186468, Submission: 02/12/2019, Registration: 04/12/2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04186468 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-026-01827-5
Primary Topic
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Piloting an ICU follow-up clinic — qualitative process evaluation alongside a feasibility study

Magdalena Rohr, Katharina Pielmeier, Susanne Brandstetter, Christine Bernardi et al.
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
article

Piloting an ICU follow-up clinic — qualitative process evaluation alongside a feasibility study

Magdalena Rohr, Katharina Pielmeier, Susanne Brandstetter, Christine Bernardi, Vreni Brunnthaler, Christoph Fisser, Maximilian V. Malfertheiner, Karl Philipp Drewitz, Christian Apfelbacher
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have not demonstrated sufficient effects of intensive care unit (ICU) follow-up clinics on health-related quality of life. This may also be influenced by the design and implementation of these studies. Feasibility and context of such studies have yet to be sufficiently researched. It is therefore crucial to investigate these contextual factors. This study aimed to explore the experiences of patients, relatives, and healthcare professionals with both the randomised controlled trial (RCT) and the ICU follow-up clinic, to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and the study design from the perspectives of those involved. METHODS: This qualitative research was embedded in the process evaluation of a pilot RCT on an ICU follow-up clinic. We conducted 18 semi-structured interviews with former ICU patients, relatives and the clinical study team who participated in the PINA study and used field notes from the clinical study team. Data analysis was carried out using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: The pilot RCT was well received by potential patients and their relatives, and the motivation to participate was high, as was the motivation of the clinical study team. The main benefits of the ICU follow-up clinic intervention named by participants were being taken seriously and receiving referrals that they would not typically get from a general practitioner. The offer of home visits for patients with long travel distances to the ICU follow-up clinic was highly appreciated. CONCLUSIONS: It was feasible to integrate the perspectives of patients, relatives, and healthcare professionals within a pilot RCT on an ICU follow-up clinic. Across all stakeholder groups, the ICU follow-up clinic and the RCT trial design were considered acceptable and valuable, suggesting that such follow-up care meets patient needs and that a large-scale study appears feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov US NLM, NCT04186468, Submission: 02/12/2019, Registration: 04/12/2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04186468 .

Pilot and Feasibility StudiesVol. 12(1)
University Hospital Regensburg (DE), Klinik Donaustauf (DE), Caritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef (DE), University of Regensburg (DE), Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.