0795 Polysomnographic and Clinical Associations of Comorbid Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Restless Legs Syndrome (Co-ROSA)

Abstract Introduction The coexistence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and restless legs syndrome (RLS), recently termed Co-ROSA, has been increasingly recognized but remains underexplored. This study aimed to compare comorbidities, sleep architecture, and psychiatric outcomes in patients with Co-ROSA with controls, OSA, and RLS alone. The central research question was whether Co-ROSA represents a distinct phenotype with amplified risk for specific comorbidities. Methods We studied adults undergoing in-laboratory polysomnography (PSG) at an academic sleep center. Patients were classified into four groups: Group 0 (neither condition), Group 1 (OSA only), Group 2 (Co-ROSA), and Group 3 (RLS only). Demographics, comorbidities, medication use, and PSG parameters were compared between groups using ANOVA, chi-square tests, and multivariable logistic regression. We examined associations with medical and psychiatric comorbidities, adjusting for age, sex, BMI, and medication use. Results A total of 153 patients were included. The mean age was 58.0 ± 21.1 years in Group 0, 54.6 ± 19.9 in Group 1, 54.2 ± 16.2 in Group 2, and 64.8 ± 12.7 in Group 3. The proportion of male participants was 55.6% in Group 0, 60.0% in Group 1, 56.5% in Group 2, and 37.5% in Group 3. Patients with Co-ROSA (group 2) had longer sleep latency (23.9 ± 22.2 minutes), shorter total sleep time (330.8 ± 67.5 minutes), and higher WASO (wake after sleep onset: 74.7 ± 53.3 minutes) compared to Groups 0 and 1, although not statistically significant. Group 2 also exhibited the highest rates of anxiety (63.2%) and depression (52.6%) compared to all other groups (p < 0.05). Regression analyses confirmed Co-ROSA as an independent predictor of both anxiety (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.07–2.67, p=0.023) and depression (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.10–3.09, p=0.021). When compared to OSA alone, patients with Co-ROSA had fourfold higher odds of anxiety (OR 4.24, 95% CI 1.47–12.26) and higher odds of depression (OR 2.94, 95% CI 1.04–8.31). Odds ratios for other medical comorbidities, including diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, peripheral neuropathy, and insomnia, did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion Patients with Co-ROSA represent a high-risk subgroup with disproportionately elevated risk of depression and anxiety independent of demographic and pharmacologic confounders. Polysomnographic, comorbidities, or medication use were not statistically significant. Support (if any) none

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.0794
Primary Topic
Restless Legs Syndrome Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

0795 Polysomnographic and Clinical Associations of Comorbid Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Restless Legs Syndrome (Co-ROSA)

Jasmeet Sandhu, Melissa Palomino, Lourdes DelRosso
SLEEP
Restless Legs Syndrome Research
article

0795 Polysomnographic and Clinical Associations of Comorbid Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Restless Legs Syndrome (Co-ROSA)

Jasmeet Sandhu, Melissa Palomino, Lourdes DelRosso
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The coexistence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and restless legs syndrome (RLS), recently termed Co-ROSA, has been increasingly recognized but remains underexplored. This study aimed to compare comorbidities, sleep architecture, and psychiatric outcomes in patients with Co-ROSA with controls, OSA, and RLS alone. The central research question was whether Co-ROSA represents a distinct phenotype with amplified risk for specific comorbidities. Methods We studied adults undergoing in-laboratory polysomnography (PSG) at an academic sleep center. Patients were classified into four groups: Group 0 (neither condition), Group 1 (OSA only), Group 2 (Co-ROSA), and Group 3 (RLS only). Demographics, comorbidities, medication use, and PSG parameters were compared between groups using ANOVA, chi-square tests, and multivariable logistic regression. We examined associations with medical and psychiatric comorbidities, adjusting for age, sex, BMI, and medication use. Results A total of 153 patients were included. The mean age was 58.0 ± 21.1 years in Group 0, 54.6 ± 19.9 in Group 1, 54.2 ± 16.2 in Group 2, and 64.8 ± 12.7 in Group 3. The proportion of male participants was 55.6% in Group 0, 60.0% in Group 1, 56.5% in Group 2, and 37.5% in Group 3. Patients with Co-ROSA (group 2) had longer sleep latency (23.9 ± 22.2 minutes), shorter total sleep time (330.8 ± 67.5 minutes), and higher WASO (wake after sleep onset: 74.7 ± 53.3 minutes) compared to Groups 0 and 1, although not statistically significant. Group 2 also exhibited the highest rates of anxiety (63.2%) and depression (52.6%) compared to all other groups (p < 0.05). Regression analyses confirmed Co-ROSA as an independent predictor of both anxiety (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.07–2.67, p=0.023) and depression (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.10–3.09, p=0.021). When compared to OSA alone, patients with Co-ROSA had fourfold higher odds of anxiety (OR 4.24, 95% CI 1.47–12.26) and higher odds of depression (OR 2.94, 95% CI 1.04–8.31). Odds ratios for other medical comorbidities, including diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, peripheral neuropathy, and insomnia, did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion Patients with Co-ROSA represent a high-risk subgroup with disproportionately elevated risk of depression and anxiety independent of demographic and pharmacologic confounders. Polysomnographic, comorbidities, or medication use were not statistically significant. Support (if any) none

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
University of California, San Francisco (US), Inspire Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Restless Legs Syndrome Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.