A review of participatory mapping in conservation science and practice

Abstract Participatory mapping is a collaborative process through which participants and cartographers co‐develop maps to represent their knowledge, experiences, and preferences regarding a relevant area, enabling communities to visualize and analyze their environment and potentially spur transformative social change. There has been a recent increase and diversification in the use of participatory mapping in the field of conservation; however, methodological standards remain both disjointed and confounding. We conducted a comprehensive review of the conservation participatory mapping literature, providing a road map to the diverse studies of this field and best practices for incorporation into science and practice. We synthesized geographical, temporal, and topical trends across a total of 398 peer‐reviewed studies to provide current findings, common pitfalls, ethical standards, strengths and weaknesses. We offer future directions to increase methodological cohesion, propel the field forward, and introduce interested conservation researchers and practitioners to participatory mapping.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Science and Practice
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.70300
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A review of participatory mapping in conservation science and practice

Christine E. Wilkinson, Christopher C. Wilmers, Natalia Ocampo‐Peñuela, Michael B. Kowalski
Conservation Science and Practice
Species Distribution and Climate Change
article

A review of participatory mapping in conservation science and practice

Christine E. Wilkinson, Christopher C. Wilmers, Natalia Ocampo‐Peñuela, Michael B. Kowalski
article en

Abstract

Abstract Participatory mapping is a collaborative process through which participants and cartographers co‐develop maps to represent their knowledge, experiences, and preferences regarding a relevant area, enabling communities to visualize and analyze their environment and potentially spur transformative social change. There has been a recent increase and diversification in the use of participatory mapping in the field of conservation; however, methodological standards remain both disjointed and confounding. We conducted a comprehensive review of the conservation participatory mapping literature, providing a road map to the diverse studies of this field and best practices for incorporation into science and practice. We synthesized geographical, temporal, and topical trends across a total of 398 peer‐reviewed studies to provide current findings, common pitfalls, ethical standards, strengths and weaknesses. We offer future directions to increase methodological cohesion, propel the field forward, and introduce interested conservation researchers and practitioners to participatory mapping.

Conservation Science and Practice
University of California, Santa Cruz (US), Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (US), California Academy of Sciences (US)
National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.