SES bias in facial trustworthiness judgments: The roles of perceivers' SES and implicit SES stereotypes

People often perceive and judge others' facial trustworthiness based on social categories such as race and gender, yet the influence of socioeconomic status (SES) on these judgments remains underexplored. The present study investigated the effect of targets' SES on facial trustworthiness judgments and examined the possible mechanisms. In Experiment 1, a nonstudent community sample completed a facial trustworthiness rating task. In Experiment 2, another community sample completed a facial trustworthiness rating task, an Implicit Association Test measuring implicit SES stereotypes, and questionnaires assessing explicit SES bias and objective SES. Experiment 3 directly replicated Experiment 2 in an independent community sample. Across three experiments, high-SES faces were rated as more trustworthy than low-SES faces, indicating a pro-high-SES bias in facial trustworthiness judgments. Moreover, Experiments 2 and 3 converged on the finding that the association between implicit SES stereotypes and SES bias depended on perceivers' SES: stronger implicit SES stereotypes predicted greater pro-high-SES bias primarily among perceivers with relatively low SES. These findings suggest that SES-based bias in facial trustworthiness judgments is affected not only by targets' socioeconomic position but also by perceivers' SES, thereby advancing our understanding of SES-related bias in social perception.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychologica
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106982
Primary Topic
Face Recognition and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SES bias in facial trustworthiness judgments: The roles of perceivers' SES and implicit SES stereotypes

H Li, Xueting Niu
Acta Psychologica
Face Recognition and Perception
article

SES bias in facial trustworthiness judgments: The roles of perceivers' SES and implicit SES stereotypes

H Li, Xueting Niu
article en

Abstract

People often perceive and judge others' facial trustworthiness based on social categories such as race and gender, yet the influence of socioeconomic status (SES) on these judgments remains underexplored. The present study investigated the effect of targets' SES on facial trustworthiness judgments and examined the possible mechanisms. In Experiment 1, a nonstudent community sample completed a facial trustworthiness rating task. In Experiment 2, another community sample completed a facial trustworthiness rating task, an Implicit Association Test measuring implicit SES stereotypes, and questionnaires assessing explicit SES bias and objective SES. Experiment 3 directly replicated Experiment 2 in an independent community sample. Across three experiments, high-SES faces were rated as more trustworthy than low-SES faces, indicating a pro-high-SES bias in facial trustworthiness judgments. Moreover, Experiments 2 and 3 converged on the finding that the association between implicit SES stereotypes and SES bias depended on perceivers' SES: stronger implicit SES stereotypes predicted greater pro-high-SES bias primarily among perceivers with relatively low SES. These findings suggest that SES-based bias in facial trustworthiness judgments is affected not only by targets' socioeconomic position but also by perceivers' SES, thereby advancing our understanding of SES-related bias in social perception.

Acta PsychologicaVol. 267
Northwest University (CN)
Humanities and Social Sciences Youth Foundation, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Face Recognition and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.