Analysis of industry-specific responses to Scope 3 categories using carbon disclosure project (CDP) disclosure data

This study examines industry differences in Scope 3 disclosures among Korean firms using CDP climate disclosure data. The analysis initially reviewed 352 Korean companies listed in the 2023 CDP Climate Change: Korea Company Overview, from which 159 firms that disclosed at least one Scope 3 category with quantitative emissions data were selected for the final sample. Disclosure was coded as a binary variable indicating whether emissions were quantitatively reported for each of the 15 Scope 3 categories defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. Industry-level disclosure rates were calculated and Pearson’s chi-square tests with Cramer's V were conducted to examine associations between industry groups and disclosure patterns. The results show that in general, Scope 3 disclosures occur more frequently in upstream categories related to internal activities or supplier management, while downstream categories associated with product use and end-of-life stages exhibit relatively lower disclosure rates. Significant industry differences were identified in Category 3, 4, 9, and 10, suggesting that Scope 3 disclosure patterns are strongly influenced by industry-specific value chain structures and operational characteristics. These findings highlight structural heterogeneity in Scope 3 disclosure practices across industries and suggest the need for industry-specific disclosure guidance, improved supply chain data accessibility, and collaborative data-sharing mechanisms to enhance the completeness and comparability of Scope 3 reporting.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Climate Change Research
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15531/ksccr.2026.17.2.455
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of industry-specific responses to Scope 3 categories using carbon disclosure project (CDP) disclosure data

Hyejin Ahn, Ahreum Kim, Soojung Lee, Younkyoo Kim et al.
Journal of Climate Change Research
Environmental Sustainability in Business
article

Analysis of industry-specific responses to Scope 3 categories using carbon disclosure project (CDP) disclosure data

Hyejin Ahn, Ahreum Kim, Soojung Lee, Younkyoo Kim, Sujin Kang, Iju Kang
article en

Abstract

This study examines industry differences in Scope 3 disclosures among Korean firms using CDP climate disclosure data. The analysis initially reviewed 352 Korean companies listed in the 2023 CDP Climate Change: Korea Company Overview, from which 159 firms that disclosed at least one Scope 3 category with quantitative emissions data were selected for the final sample. Disclosure was coded as a binary variable indicating whether emissions were quantitatively reported for each of the 15 Scope 3 categories defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. Industry-level disclosure rates were calculated and Pearson’s chi-square tests with Cramer's V were conducted to examine associations between industry groups and disclosure patterns. The results show that in general, Scope 3 disclosures occur more frequently in upstream categories related to internal activities or supplier management, while downstream categories associated with product use and end-of-life stages exhibit relatively lower disclosure rates. Significant industry differences were identified in Category 3, 4, 9, and 10, suggesting that Scope 3 disclosure patterns are strongly influenced by industry-specific value chain structures and operational characteristics. These findings highlight structural heterogeneity in Scope 3 disclosure practices across industries and suggest the need for industry-specific disclosure guidance, improved supply chain data accessibility, and collaborative data-sharing mechanisms to enhance the completeness and comparability of Scope 3 reporting.

Journal of Climate Change ResearchVol. 17(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.