Head Scanning by Drivers With Left Homonymous Visual Field Loss: A Naturalistic Driving Pilot Study

IMPORTANCE: Little is known about compensatory scanning by drivers with homonymous visual field loss (HVFL) in daily driving. OBJECTIVE: To use naturalistic driving methods to investigate the feasibility of quantifying head scanning behaviors of HVFL drivers in daily driving. DESIGN: Cross-sectional pilot study with video and GPS data collected from dashboard cameras installed in participants' personal vehicles between October 2023 and June 2024. SETTING: Intersections with left-turn maneuvers in daily driving. PARTICIPANTS: Two drivers with HVFL (ages 52 and 63 yr) and two with normal vision (NV; ages 47 and 62 yr), all male, recruited from study site databases. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Head scanning behaviors were quantified from driver-facing videos, including the number and magnitude of leftward and rightward scans. Road-facing videos were manually annotated for environmental features associated with situations in which no leftward scan was made. RESULTS: HVFL drivers exhibited greater leftward than rightward scan magnitude (∼20° difference), whereas NV drivers showed minimal difference (∼3°). Cross-traffic from the left increased left scan frequency for HVFL drivers but not NV drivers. HVFL drivers never failed to scan to the left at stop-sign intersections, although NV drivers sometimes did, but they did fail to scan left at some traffic light and no-sign intersections. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These results demonstrate the feasibility of using naturalistic driving methods to quantify compensatory scanning as well as failures to scan in daily driving of individuals with HVFL. The methods have potential for application in larger-scale research studies as well as in clinical driving rehabilitation. Plain-Language Summary: Drivers with homonymous visual field loss (HVFL), the loss of half the visual field in both eyes, need to make large head scans (head turns) to see hazards approaching on the nonseeing side. However, little is known about how drivers with HVFL scan in daily driving because most prior studies have been conducted in a driving simulator or during a road test in an unfamiliar vehicle. We used an in-car camera in each participant's own vehicle to record head scanning before left turns at intersections. Drivers with HVFL made larger and more frequent head scans toward their nonseeing side than drivers with normal vision, suggesting compensatory scanning by HVFL drivers; however, both groups sometimes failed to scan in low-demand situations (e.g., when no traffic was present). These findings suggest that our methods can be successfully used to investigate scanning behaviors in daily driving and are feasible for implementation in a study with more participants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Occupational Therapy
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2026.051510
Primary Topic
Older Adults Driving Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Head Scanning by Drivers With Left Homonymous Visual Field Loss: A Naturalistic Driving Pilot Study

Chen-Yuan Lee, Alex R. Bowers, Naser Al-Madi, Seonggyu Choe et al.
American Journal of Occupational Therapy
Older Adults Driving Studies
article

Head Scanning by Drivers With Left Homonymous Visual Field Loss: A Naturalistic Driving Pilot Study

Chen-Yuan Lee, Alex R. Bowers, Naser Al-Madi, Seonggyu Choe, Patrick Baker, Shrinivas Pundlik, Gang Luo
article en

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Little is known about compensatory scanning by drivers with homonymous visual field loss (HVFL) in daily driving. OBJECTIVE: To use naturalistic driving methods to investigate the feasibility of quantifying head scanning behaviors of HVFL drivers in daily driving. DESIGN: Cross-sectional pilot study with video and GPS data collected from dashboard cameras installed in participants' personal vehicles between October 2023 and June 2024. SETTING: Intersections with left-turn maneuvers in daily driving. PARTICIPANTS: Two drivers with HVFL (ages 52 and 63 yr) and two with normal vision (NV; ages 47 and 62 yr), all male, recruited from study site databases. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Head scanning behaviors were quantified from driver-facing videos, including the number and magnitude of leftward and rightward scans. Road-facing videos were manually annotated for environmental features associated with situations in which no leftward scan was made. RESULTS: HVFL drivers exhibited greater leftward than rightward scan magnitude (∼20° difference), whereas NV drivers showed minimal difference (∼3°). Cross-traffic from the left increased left scan frequency for HVFL drivers but not NV drivers. HVFL drivers never failed to scan to the left at stop-sign intersections, although NV drivers sometimes did, but they did fail to scan left at some traffic light and no-sign intersections. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These results demonstrate the feasibility of using naturalistic driving methods to quantify compensatory scanning as well as failures to scan in daily driving of individuals with HVFL. The methods have potential for application in larger-scale research studies as well as in clinical driving rehabilitation. Plain-Language Summary: Drivers with homonymous visual field loss (HVFL), the loss of half the visual field in both eyes, need to make large head scans (head turns) to see hazards approaching on the nonseeing side. However, little is known about how drivers with HVFL scan in daily driving because most prior studies have been conducted in a driving simulator or during a road test in an unfamiliar vehicle. We used an in-car camera in each participant's own vehicle to record head scanning before left turns at intersections. Drivers with HVFL made larger and more frequent head scans toward their nonseeing side than drivers with normal vision, suggesting compensatory scanning by HVFL drivers; however, both groups sometimes failed to scan in low-demand situations (e.g., when no traffic was present). These findings suggest that our methods can be successfully used to investigate scanning behaviors in daily driving and are feasible for implementation in a study with more participants.

American Journal of Occupational TherapyVol. 80(4)
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Older Adults Driving Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.