A Unified Bayesian Framework for Cross-Technology Collision Cross Section Postcalibration Correction and Multilaboratory Harmonization

Reliable comparison of collision cross section (CCS) measurements across ion mobility platforms remains a key challenge for standardized molecular identification. We present a hierarchical, data-driven postcalibration correction framework that harmonizes CCS values across drift tube (DTIMS), trapped ion mobility (TIMS), and traveling wave (TWIMS) instruments, enabling quantitative cross-technology comparison despite differing calibration methods. Using a multilaboratory dataset of 840 measurements for 347 compounds, the framework reduced intertechnology CCS variability by approximately 95%, bringing residual differences within instrumental precision limits. Leave-one-compound-out validation demonstrated robust cross-technology transfer, lowering the median absolute percentage error from 8.9% to 3.2% and achieving 94.6% empirical coverage of 95% prediction intervals. The approach requires as few as three reference compounds, reducing recalibration workload by more than half, and provides full uncertainty estimates for probability-based database matching. This statistically grounded yet practical strategy enables harmonized, uncertainty-aware CCS databases and supports reproducible compound identification across laboratories and ion mobility technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5c06667
Primary Topic
Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Unified Bayesian Framework for Cross-Technology Collision Cross Section Postcalibration Correction and Multilaboratory Harmonization

George Sun, Yi-Hui Zhou
Analytical Chemistry
Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
article

A Unified Bayesian Framework for Cross-Technology Collision Cross Section Postcalibration Correction and Multilaboratory Harmonization

George Sun, Yi-Hui Zhou
article en

Abstract

Reliable comparison of collision cross section (CCS) measurements across ion mobility platforms remains a key challenge for standardized molecular identification. We present a hierarchical, data-driven postcalibration correction framework that harmonizes CCS values across drift tube (DTIMS), trapped ion mobility (TIMS), and traveling wave (TWIMS) instruments, enabling quantitative cross-technology comparison despite differing calibration methods. Using a multilaboratory dataset of 840 measurements for 347 compounds, the framework reduced intertechnology CCS variability by approximately 95%, bringing residual differences within instrumental precision limits. Leave-one-compound-out validation demonstrated robust cross-technology transfer, lowering the median absolute percentage error from 8.9% to 3.2% and achieving 94.6% empirical coverage of 95% prediction intervals. The approach requires as few as three reference compounds, reducing recalibration workload by more than half, and provides full uncertainty estimates for probability-based database matching. This statistically grounded yet practical strategy enables harmonized, uncertainty-aware CCS databases and supports reproducible compound identification across laboratories and ion mobility technologies.

Analytical Chemistry
North Carolina State University (US), Dimensional Imaging (United Kingdom) (GB), Department of Biological Sciences (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.