A Comprehensive Mapping of Intergenerational Caregiving: A Scoping Review of Dyadic and Family Caregiving

ABSTRACT Families remain central to later‐life support, yet evidence on intergenerational caregiving is fragmented across dyads, generations, and cultural contexts. This scoping review maps how caregiving is organized and negotiated across structural, associational, affectual, functional, consensual, and normative dimensions. Following PRISMA‐ScR and Arksey and O’Malley's framework, seven databases and Google Scholar were searched. Eligible studies reported empirical findings on care exchanged between family members of different generations, sampled at dyadic, triadic, or family levels, and published in English since 2000. Data were charted to Intergenerational Solidarity dimensions and intergenerational ambivalence and synthesized using a framework approach. Forty‐nine studies met criteria, largely qualitative and Western. Proximity and co‐residence structured caregiving intensity, while distance prompted mediated contact, remittances, rotational arrangements, and formal services. Care flows were multidirectional and networked, moderated by affectual climate and consensual governance. Policy should recognize caregiving as networked and multidirectional, while research must broaden samples and adopt longitudinal designs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Family Theory & Review
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.70067
Primary Topic
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comprehensive Mapping of Intergenerational Caregiving: A Scoping Review of Dyadic and Family Caregiving

Jun Yi Claire Teo, Zoe Jane‐Lara Hildon, Wenru Wang, Xin Hui Chua et al.
Journal of Family Theory & Review
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
article

A Comprehensive Mapping of Intergenerational Caregiving: A Scoping Review of Dyadic and Family Caregiving

Jun Yi Claire Teo, Zoe Jane‐Lara Hildon, Wenru Wang, Xin Hui Chua, Alvin Chuen Wei Seah, Tin Mei Yeo, Yong‐Shian Shawn Goh
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Families remain central to later‐life support, yet evidence on intergenerational caregiving is fragmented across dyads, generations, and cultural contexts. This scoping review maps how caregiving is organized and negotiated across structural, associational, affectual, functional, consensual, and normative dimensions. Following PRISMA‐ScR and Arksey and O’Malley's framework, seven databases and Google Scholar were searched. Eligible studies reported empirical findings on care exchanged between family members of different generations, sampled at dyadic, triadic, or family levels, and published in English since 2000. Data were charted to Intergenerational Solidarity dimensions and intergenerational ambivalence and synthesized using a framework approach. Forty‐nine studies met criteria, largely qualitative and Western. Proximity and co‐residence structured caregiving intensity, while distance prompted mediated contact, remittances, rotational arrangements, and formal services. Care flows were multidirectional and networked, moderated by affectual climate and consensual governance. Policy should recognize caregiving as networked and multidirectional, while research must broaden samples and adopt longitudinal designs.

Journal of Family Theory & Review
National University of Singapore (SG), Singapore Institute of Technology (SG), National University Health System (SG)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.