Long-Term Patient Reported Outcomes of Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Management of Pediatric Medial Epicondyle Fractures

BACKGROUND: Indications for surgical fixation of medial epicondyle fractures have been debated for over 4 decades, with no clear consensus supporting operative versus nonoperative management. Medial epicondyle fractures account for ∼11% to 20% of pediatric elbow fractures and are associated with posterior elbow dislocation in up to 60% of cases. The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term outcomes of surgical versus nonsurgical management of medial epicondyle fractures with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. METHODS: Pediatric patients evaluated for a medial epicondyle fracture at a tertiary academic health center over a 10-year period were eligible for inclusion. Treatment was determined by the treating surgeon. Operative indications during the study period included fragment incarceration, displacement >5 mm, and elbow valgus instability. Displacement was measured on the internal oblique radiographic view. Eligible patients or their guardians were contacted by telephone and invited to complete standardised patient-reported outcome measures, including the quick disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Upper Extremity Score, to assess functional outcomes 2 to 10 years following treatment. RESULTS: Nonparametric analysis demonstrated significant differences between groups in age at injury (P=0.001), injury occurrence during wrestling (P=0.002), and fracture displacement >5 mm (P<0.001). No significant differences were identified in QuickDASH scores (P=0.649), PROMIS scores (P=0.963), or range of motion between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: In this unmatched cohort with long-term follow-up, no clinically meaningful differences in patient-reported outcomes were observed between groups. Surgically treated patients were older and had greater fracture displacement, reflecting indication-based treatment selection. These findings suggest that both operative and nonoperative strategies can result in comparable long-term outcomes when applied to appropriately selected patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/bpo.0000000000003307
Primary Topic
Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-Term Patient Reported Outcomes of Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Management of Pediatric Medial Epicondyle Fractures

Andrew Monhollen, Sumit K. Gupta, Ana C. Belzarena, Nash Kolb
Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
article

Long-Term Patient Reported Outcomes of Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Management of Pediatric Medial Epicondyle Fractures

Andrew Monhollen, Sumit K. Gupta, Ana C. Belzarena, Nash Kolb
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Indications for surgical fixation of medial epicondyle fractures have been debated for over 4 decades, with no clear consensus supporting operative versus nonoperative management. Medial epicondyle fractures account for ∼11% to 20% of pediatric elbow fractures and are associated with posterior elbow dislocation in up to 60% of cases. The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term outcomes of surgical versus nonsurgical management of medial epicondyle fractures with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. METHODS: Pediatric patients evaluated for a medial epicondyle fracture at a tertiary academic health center over a 10-year period were eligible for inclusion. Treatment was determined by the treating surgeon. Operative indications during the study period included fragment incarceration, displacement >5 mm, and elbow valgus instability. Displacement was measured on the internal oblique radiographic view. Eligible patients or their guardians were contacted by telephone and invited to complete standardised patient-reported outcome measures, including the quick disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Upper Extremity Score, to assess functional outcomes 2 to 10 years following treatment. RESULTS: Nonparametric analysis demonstrated significant differences between groups in age at injury (P=0.001), injury occurrence during wrestling (P=0.002), and fracture displacement >5 mm (P<0.001). No significant differences were identified in QuickDASH scores (P=0.649), PROMIS scores (P=0.963), or range of motion between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: In this unmatched cohort with long-term follow-up, no clinically meaningful differences in patient-reported outcomes were observed between groups. Surgically treated patients were older and had greater fracture displacement, reflecting indication-based treatment selection. These findings suggest that both operative and nonoperative strategies can result in comparable long-term outcomes when applied to appropriately selected patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
University of Missouri (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.