0178 Phone Use Patterns Surrounding Sleep Onset and Offset in College Students

Abstract Introduction Measuring sleep timing information through passive phone-usage metrics could increase sample sizes and reduce participant burden for clinical and research use. A required step is evaluating how phone-based measures compare with established methods. We investigated the relationship between phone usage and recorded sleep-onset and offset timing across 30 days in college students. Methods 202 college students (35% Female) completed 30 days of at-home monitoring with wrist actigraphy, daily sleep diaries, and phone-usage tracking. All screen-on events longer than 10 secs (to reduce notification-only events) were identified and averaged in 10-minute bins within a 5-h window surrounding both sleep onset and offset times, not including naps, as defined using actigraphy and sleep diaries. For each participant, phone use within this time window was normalized, mean phone use during the 30 min before and after each transition was calculated, and paired t-tests were run. To evaluate whether the difference scores could identify sleep onset or offset, we determined the percentage of participants whose scores exceeded one standard deviation from the mean difference across each transition. Results At sleep onset, mean phone use dropped from 7.5% ±4.0 (SD) in the 30 minutes before to 1.1% ±1.4 after (p<.001). At sleep offset, phone use increased from 2.6% ±1.6 before to 5.3% ±2.0 after (p<.001). Mean difference scores were –6.4 ±4.2% for sleep onset and 2.7 ±2.8% for sleep offset. Only ~65% of participants for sleep onset and ~55% for sleep offset had differences in percentage use within one standard deviation of the mean: ~35% or ~45% (respectively) of participants had differences outside this range. Conclusion As expected, phone use showed a clear group-level shift across sleep-wake transitions. However, large individual differences limit the ability to use these difference scores for classifying sleep onset or offset on an individual level. Phone-use difference scores around sleep transitions based on these methods are not yet reliable individual-level markers of sleep timing in this population. Higher-resolution data and personalized normalization may improve predictions. Support (if any) NIH R01GM105018, NEC, Samsung Electronics

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.0178
Primary Topic
Sleep and related disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

0178 Phone Use Patterns Surrounding Sleep Onset and Offset in College Students

Andrew N. Phillips, Katie McCullar, R. Robbins, Elizabeth Klerman et al.
SLEEP
Sleep and related disorders
article

0178 Phone Use Patterns Surrounding Sleep Onset and Offset in College Students

Andrew N. Phillips, Katie McCullar, R. Robbins, Elizabeth Klerman, Akane Sano, Andrew McHill, Charles Czeisler, Penelope Hollister, Melissa St. Hilaire
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Measuring sleep timing information through passive phone-usage metrics could increase sample sizes and reduce participant burden for clinical and research use. A required step is evaluating how phone-based measures compare with established methods. We investigated the relationship between phone usage and recorded sleep-onset and offset timing across 30 days in college students. Methods 202 college students (35% Female) completed 30 days of at-home monitoring with wrist actigraphy, daily sleep diaries, and phone-usage tracking. All screen-on events longer than 10 secs (to reduce notification-only events) were identified and averaged in 10-minute bins within a 5-h window surrounding both sleep onset and offset times, not including naps, as defined using actigraphy and sleep diaries. For each participant, phone use within this time window was normalized, mean phone use during the 30 min before and after each transition was calculated, and paired t-tests were run. To evaluate whether the difference scores could identify sleep onset or offset, we determined the percentage of participants whose scores exceeded one standard deviation from the mean difference across each transition. Results At sleep onset, mean phone use dropped from 7.5% ±4.0 (SD) in the 30 minutes before to 1.1% ±1.4 after (p<.001). At sleep offset, phone use increased from 2.6% ±1.6 before to 5.3% ±2.0 after (p<.001). Mean difference scores were –6.4 ±4.2% for sleep onset and 2.7 ±2.8% for sleep offset. Only ~65% of participants for sleep onset and ~55% for sleep offset had differences in percentage use within one standard deviation of the mean: ~35% or ~45% (respectively) of participants had differences outside this range. Conclusion As expected, phone use showed a clear group-level shift across sleep-wake transitions. However, large individual differences limit the ability to use these difference scores for classifying sleep onset or offset on an individual level. Phone-use difference scores around sleep transitions based on these methods are not yet reliable individual-level markers of sleep timing in this population. Higher-resolution data and personalized normalization may improve predictions. Support (if any) NIH R01GM105018, NEC, Samsung Electronics

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Oregon Health & Science University (US), Flinders University (AU), Merrimack College (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Rice University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Sleep and related disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.