0564 Making Type III HSAT Recordings Conclusive: Large-Scale Validation of an FDA-Cleared AI AHI Classifier from HSAT Signals

Abstract Introduction Type III home sleep apnea tests (HSAT) lack electroencephalography for sleep and arousal scoring. Currently, a respiratory event index based on monitoring time, rather than an apnea–hypopnea index (AHI), is commonly reported from HSATs. This underestimates disease severity and leaves HSAT studies inconclusive, necessitating in-lab polysomnography. We evaluated whether DeepRESP v2.0 (K252330), an FDA 510(k)-cleared medical device, yields conclusive AHI-based severity classification aligned with attended polysomnography from HSAT signals commonly acquired in patients’ homes. Methods We conducted a retrospective, multicenter validation using 5,771 Type I/II polysomnograms from accredited US sleep programs, manually scored by registered technologists and board-certified sleep physicians. To our knowledge, this dataset is substantially larger than the cohorts typically used in FDA 510(k) validation studies of HSAT devices. HSAT channels (nasal pressure, thoracoabdominal inductance belts, oximetry, body position) were fed to the device to score wake/NREM/REM, arousals, and respiratory events, and to compute AHI. Reference AHI came from full-montage manual scoring. Positive percentage (PPA), negative percentage (NPA), and overall percentage agreement (OPA) with manual AHI categories (≥5, ≥15, ≥30 events/hour) were estimated with 95% confidence intervals. Subgroups summarized heterogeneity in age, sex, BMI, severity, and race/ethnicity. Results The cohort was heterogeneous: adults aged 18 to >65 years; 35% were female; 58% had BMI ≥30 kg/m2; AHI ranged from normal to severe; and recordings included PSGs from both in-laboratory and home settings. For AHI classification, agreement with manual scoring was high across thresholds: for AHI ≥5, PPA 91.0%, NPA 78.0%, OPA 90.6%; for AHI ≥15, PPA 78.1%, NPA 93.9%, OPA 81.7%; and for AHI ≥30, PPA 69.9%, NPA 97.5%, OPA 85.0%. High agreement was observed across demographic subgroups (age, sex, BMI, and race/ethnicity), supporting consistent performance across a diverse adult population. Conclusion AHI derived from the device closely aligns with conventional AHI from attended polysomnography, supporting conclusive severity classification from HSAT and potentially reducing inconclusive HSAT studies and repeat in-lab testing, thereby streamlining the diagnostic pathway and earlier linkage to therapy. Support (if any) None

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.0563
Primary Topic
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

0564 Making Type III HSAT Recordings Conclusive: Large-Scale Validation of an FDA-Cleared AI AHI Classifier from HSAT Signals

Sigurdur Aegir Jonsson, Ernir Erlingsson, Kristófer Montazeri, Eydís Arnardóttir et al.
SLEEP
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
article

0564 Making Type III HSAT Recordings Conclusive: Large-Scale Validation of an FDA-Cleared AI AHI Classifier from HSAT Signals

Sigurdur Aegir Jonsson, Ernir Erlingsson, Kristófer Montazeri, Eydís Arnardóttir, Jon Agustsson, Eysteinn Finnsson, Heidi Riney, Daniel Wilcox, Rósa Hugosdóttir, Megan McPhee, Þóra Sigmarsdottir, Guðný Árnadóttir
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Type III home sleep apnea tests (HSAT) lack electroencephalography for sleep and arousal scoring. Currently, a respiratory event index based on monitoring time, rather than an apnea–hypopnea index (AHI), is commonly reported from HSATs. This underestimates disease severity and leaves HSAT studies inconclusive, necessitating in-lab polysomnography. We evaluated whether DeepRESP v2.0 (K252330), an FDA 510(k)-cleared medical device, yields conclusive AHI-based severity classification aligned with attended polysomnography from HSAT signals commonly acquired in patients’ homes. Methods We conducted a retrospective, multicenter validation using 5,771 Type I/II polysomnograms from accredited US sleep programs, manually scored by registered technologists and board-certified sleep physicians. To our knowledge, this dataset is substantially larger than the cohorts typically used in FDA 510(k) validation studies of HSAT devices. HSAT channels (nasal pressure, thoracoabdominal inductance belts, oximetry, body position) were fed to the device to score wake/NREM/REM, arousals, and respiratory events, and to compute AHI. Reference AHI came from full-montage manual scoring. Positive percentage (PPA), negative percentage (NPA), and overall percentage agreement (OPA) with manual AHI categories (≥5, ≥15, ≥30 events/hour) were estimated with 95% confidence intervals. Subgroups summarized heterogeneity in age, sex, BMI, severity, and race/ethnicity. Results The cohort was heterogeneous: adults aged 18 to >65 years; 35% were female; 58% had BMI ≥30 kg/m2; AHI ranged from normal to severe; and recordings included PSGs from both in-laboratory and home settings. For AHI classification, agreement with manual scoring was high across thresholds: for AHI ≥5, PPA 91.0%, NPA 78.0%, OPA 90.6%; for AHI ≥15, PPA 78.1%, NPA 93.9%, OPA 81.7%; and for AHI ≥30, PPA 69.9%, NPA 97.5%, OPA 85.0%. High agreement was observed across demographic subgroups (age, sex, BMI, and race/ethnicity), supporting consistent performance across a diverse adult population. Conclusion AHI derived from the device closely aligns with conventional AHI from attended polysomnography, supporting conclusive severity classification from HSAT and potentially reducing inconclusive HSAT studies and repeat in-lab testing, thereby streamlining the diagnostic pathway and earlier linkage to therapy. Support (if any) None

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
Rex Medical (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.