Understanding decision making factors influencing referrals to vision rehabilitation services at a tertiary medical center

Functional vision loss at any stage affects quality of life even before clinically quantified to be moderate or severe. Eye care providers as the gatekeepers to vision rehabilitation services often underestimate how small variations in functional vision loss can have a significant impact in a patient's life. Greater provider-patient communication about vision loss is an opportunity to build trust and increase access to vision rehabilitation services to improve quality of life. Tertiary eye care centers serve the greatest number of visually impaired patients. The purpose of this study was to find what factors influenced eye care providers with vision rehabilitation service referral decision-making at a tertiary medical center. We also further studied whether decision making was influenced by the eye care provider's specialty, volume of practice, years of practice, number of practicing locations, gender and continuing education status. Our survey found that about 77% of respondents were early (<10 years) in their career and 75% of posterior segment specialists agreed that people with any functional vision complaint should be referred to services regardless of visual acuity. Fifty-two percent of all respondents indicated the reason for low referrals to services was due to a lack of inquiry from patients. Inquiry about driving status by patients was an important factor for referral to services for 35% of respondents. Forty-five percent of respondents reported lack of vision rehabilitation providers and long wait times as a barrier to referrals. However, only 61% of respondents reported "never" to "sometimes" referring to community services. Posterior specialists attended more continuing education courses related to low vision/ vision rehabilitation than anterior segment specialists. By understanding influencers on eye care providers decision making, we will be able to make more targeted recommendations on workflow changes, continuing education and quality improvement processes to increase access to vision rehabilitation services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359154
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding decision making factors influencing referrals to vision rehabilitation services at a tertiary medical center

Christina L. Thomas‐Virnig, Sanbrita Mondal, Kyle Peterson, Bonnie J. Verges
PLoS ONE
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Understanding decision making factors influencing referrals to vision rehabilitation services at a tertiary medical center

Christina L. Thomas‐Virnig, Sanbrita Mondal, Kyle Peterson, Bonnie J. Verges
article en

Abstract

Functional vision loss at any stage affects quality of life even before clinically quantified to be moderate or severe. Eye care providers as the gatekeepers to vision rehabilitation services often underestimate how small variations in functional vision loss can have a significant impact in a patient's life. Greater provider-patient communication about vision loss is an opportunity to build trust and increase access to vision rehabilitation services to improve quality of life. Tertiary eye care centers serve the greatest number of visually impaired patients. The purpose of this study was to find what factors influenced eye care providers with vision rehabilitation service referral decision-making at a tertiary medical center. We also further studied whether decision making was influenced by the eye care provider's specialty, volume of practice, years of practice, number of practicing locations, gender and continuing education status. Our survey found that about 77% of respondents were early (<10 years) in their career and 75% of posterior segment specialists agreed that people with any functional vision complaint should be referred to services regardless of visual acuity. Fifty-two percent of all respondents indicated the reason for low referrals to services was due to a lack of inquiry from patients. Inquiry about driving status by patients was an important factor for referral to services for 35% of respondents. Forty-five percent of respondents reported lack of vision rehabilitation providers and long wait times as a barrier to referrals. However, only 61% of respondents reported "never" to "sometimes" referring to community services. Posterior specialists attended more continuing education courses related to low vision/ vision rehabilitation than anterior segment specialists. By understanding influencers on eye care providers decision making, we will be able to make more targeted recommendations on workflow changes, continuing education and quality improvement processes to increase access to vision rehabilitation services.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(10)
University of Wisconsin System (US)
Research to Prevent Blindness
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon