0435 Feasibility of Dose-Varied CBT-I, Associated Sleep Continuity Trajectories, & Adherence in Breast Cancer Survivors

Abstract Introduction Insomnia is a common and persistent concern among breast cancer survivors, often continuing well beyond active treatment. Although Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) improves sleep continuity, the optimal dose of the intervention in oncology settings remain unclear. This study assessed the feasibility of a multi-dose CBT-I protocol and examined trajectories of sleep continuity, and adherence over the course of treatment. Methods Breast cancer survivors aged 25–85 (n=28; 78.6% White), within 6 years of completing treatment, were enrolled. Eligible participants endorsing clinically significant insomnia and fatigue (85.7% insomnia+fatigue) were randomized to one of four CBT-I dose groups (4, 8, 10, or 12 sessions). All treatment was delivered weekly via HIPAA-compliant telehealth by a CBT-I clinician. Primary outcomes included feasibility metrics: recruitment [goal, n=60] & retention (enrolled through final session) and adherence (deviation [minutes] between prescribed & actual time-in-bed and stimulus-control schedules). Exploratory outcomes included diary-derived sleep latency (SL), wake after sleep onset (WASO), and early morning awakenings (EMA). Group differences in sleep continuity over time were evaluated with a GEE model. Secondary models tested group differences in adherence. Results Recruitment goals were successfully achieved, with 61 participants enrolled. With respect to retention, approximately half of the subjects were subsequently disenrolled due to factors such as cancer recurrence, psychosocial stressors, loss to follow-up, and the discovery of medical comorbidities (e.g., newly identified sleep apnea). Of the remaining participants, 35 initiated the study protocol, and 28 ultimately completed the trial. With respect to sleep continuity, GEE models demonstrated significant time effects, with reductions in SL, WASO and EMA across all groups (all β_time < 0, p < .001). Finally, with respect to adherence, dose did not moderate differences in groups, indicating parallel trajectories across randomized groups (all interaction p > .10). Conclusion A multi-dose CBT-I protocol is feasible for breast cancer survivors. Preliminary results suggest that across all groups, participants showed statistically significant improvements in sleep continuity over time (i.e., they fell asleep faster, spent less time awake during the night, and had fewer early awakenings). However there is no effect of CBT-I dosage on adherence. Analyses are ongoing. Support (if any) 1R21CA27098701

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.0435
Primary Topic
Sleep and related disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

0435 Feasibility of Dose-Varied CBT-I, Associated Sleep Continuity Trajectories, & Adherence in Breast Cancer Survivors

Kara Buda, Michael Perlis, Knashawn Morales, Rebecca Boswell et al.
SLEEP
Sleep and related disorders
article

0435 Feasibility of Dose-Varied CBT-I, Associated Sleep Continuity Trajectories, & Adherence in Breast Cancer Survivors

Kara Buda, Michael Perlis, Knashawn Morales, Rebecca Boswell, Alexandria Muench, Mark Seewald, Sheila Garland, Donn Posner
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Insomnia is a common and persistent concern among breast cancer survivors, often continuing well beyond active treatment. Although Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) improves sleep continuity, the optimal dose of the intervention in oncology settings remain unclear. This study assessed the feasibility of a multi-dose CBT-I protocol and examined trajectories of sleep continuity, and adherence over the course of treatment. Methods Breast cancer survivors aged 25–85 (n=28; 78.6% White), within 6 years of completing treatment, were enrolled. Eligible participants endorsing clinically significant insomnia and fatigue (85.7% insomnia+fatigue) were randomized to one of four CBT-I dose groups (4, 8, 10, or 12 sessions). All treatment was delivered weekly via HIPAA-compliant telehealth by a CBT-I clinician. Primary outcomes included feasibility metrics: recruitment [goal, n=60] & retention (enrolled through final session) and adherence (deviation [minutes] between prescribed & actual time-in-bed and stimulus-control schedules). Exploratory outcomes included diary-derived sleep latency (SL), wake after sleep onset (WASO), and early morning awakenings (EMA). Group differences in sleep continuity over time were evaluated with a GEE model. Secondary models tested group differences in adherence. Results Recruitment goals were successfully achieved, with 61 participants enrolled. With respect to retention, approximately half of the subjects were subsequently disenrolled due to factors such as cancer recurrence, psychosocial stressors, loss to follow-up, and the discovery of medical comorbidities (e.g., newly identified sleep apnea). Of the remaining participants, 35 initiated the study protocol, and 28 ultimately completed the trial. With respect to sleep continuity, GEE models demonstrated significant time effects, with reductions in SL, WASO and EMA across all groups (all β_time < 0, p < .001). Finally, with respect to adherence, dose did not moderate differences in groups, indicating parallel trajectories across randomized groups (all interaction p > .10). Conclusion A multi-dose CBT-I protocol is feasible for breast cancer survivors. Preliminary results suggest that across all groups, participants showed statistically significant improvements in sleep continuity over time (i.e., they fell asleep faster, spent less time awake during the night, and had fewer early awakenings). However there is no effect of CBT-I dosage on adherence. Analyses are ongoing. Support (if any) 1R21CA27098701

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA), California University of Pennsylvania (US), California Retina Consultants (US), University of Pennsylvania Health System (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Sleep and related disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.