Bone Graft Substitutes Used in Non-spinal Orthopaedic Arthrodesis Surgery: A Systematic Review

Bone graft is commonly used to promote joint arthrodesis. Currently, the bone graft options used surgically include autograft, allograft, and bone graft substitutes (BGS). Limited availability, potential morbidity (associated with autograft harvest), efficacy concerns, costs, and the theoretical risk of disease transmission have led to an increased use of BGS. Although there are numerous BGS available, it remains unclear which BGS provide the best clinical outcomes. This systematic review is intended to evaluate the quantity and quality of published BGS clinical outcome studies in non-spinal orthopaedic arthrodesis surgery. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library identified 1,751 studies of which 15 met inclusion criteria. All of these studies were of the foot and ankle and represented eight commercially available BGS. Among them, Augment had the most evidence and received a grade A recommendation. All other BGS received grade I recommendations due to insufficient published clinical outcome data. These findings highlight the limited published evidence on the clinical outcomes associated with the use of BGS in non-spinal orthopaedic arthrodesis surgery. Surgeons should continue to use the best available evidence when selecting BGS while recognizing the need for additional high-quality clinical studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-d-25-01307
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bone Graft Substitutes Used in Non-spinal Orthopaedic Arthrodesis Surgery: A Systematic Review

Haley Glazebrook, John MacDonald, Bernard Burgesson, Joel Morash et al.
Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

Bone Graft Substitutes Used in Non-spinal Orthopaedic Arthrodesis Surgery: A Systematic Review

Haley Glazebrook, John MacDonald, Bernard Burgesson, Joel Morash, Mark Glazebrook
article en

Abstract

Bone graft is commonly used to promote joint arthrodesis. Currently, the bone graft options used surgically include autograft, allograft, and bone graft substitutes (BGS). Limited availability, potential morbidity (associated with autograft harvest), efficacy concerns, costs, and the theoretical risk of disease transmission have led to an increased use of BGS. Although there are numerous BGS available, it remains unclear which BGS provide the best clinical outcomes. This systematic review is intended to evaluate the quantity and quality of published BGS clinical outcome studies in non-spinal orthopaedic arthrodesis surgery. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library identified 1,751 studies of which 15 met inclusion criteria. All of these studies were of the foot and ankle and represented eight commercially available BGS. Among them, Augment had the most evidence and received a grade A recommendation. All other BGS received grade I recommendations due to insufficient published clinical outcome data. These findings highlight the limited published evidence on the clinical outcomes associated with the use of BGS in non-spinal orthopaedic arthrodesis surgery. Surgeons should continue to use the best available evidence when selecting BGS while recognizing the need for additional high-quality clinical studies.

Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
Mott MacDonald (United Kingdom) (GB), Dalhousie University (CA), Universidad del Valle (NI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.