Profitability and cost-effectiveness of cowpea seed production and delivery systems: Evidence from Nigeria and Ghana

Seed systems are critical to agricultural development in sub-Saharan Africa, where smallholder farmers rely on quality seeds to boost productivity, enhance food security, and increase income generation. Despite extensive research on seed systems, there is limited empirical evidence on the profitability of different legume seed production models, particularly how investment returns respond to potential price and yield shocks, and the cost-effectiveness of various seed delivery channels in West Africa. Using data from multiple actors in cowpea seed systems, this study assesses and compares the profitability of seed production under formal, semi-formal, and informal producers, as well as the cost-effectiveness of different seed delivery channels in Ghana and Nigeria. Our results show that while the formal seed production model involves higher investment costs, it also yields greater returns, on average, in terms of net revenues, contribution margin, and benefit–cost ratio, GH₵12,400 (1205 USD/ha), 66% and 2.9, respectively, in Ghana, and ₦1,127,000 (713 USD/ha), 63% and 2.7, respectively, in Nigeria. In contrast, the semi-formal and informal producers require lower capital outlay, yet they generate reasonable returns, on average, underscoring the complementary role of these models. Results also show that profitability varies across countries. In Ghana, formal, semi-formal, and informal producers outperformed their counterparts in Nigeria, highlighting the importance of country-specific context. Beyond average returns, we find that all production models are sensitive to seed price and yield fluctuations. Lastly, our results show that along the dimensions of per-farmer delivery cost and delivery cost per kilogram of seed, agrodealers appear to be among the most cost-effective in Nigeria, while community-based seed marketing appears to be the most cost-effective in Ghana. Overall, findings highlight policy opportunities to enhance cowpea seed production and distribution systems, towards ensuring that quality seeds are available, affordable, and accessible to smallholder farmers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Outlook on Agriculture
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00307270261447906
Primary Topic
Agricultural pest management studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Profitability and cost-effectiveness of cowpea seed production and delivery systems: Evidence from Nigeria and Ghana

O. O. Ugbabe, Paul Aseete, Julius Manda, Abdulwahab S. Shaibu et al.
Outlook on Agriculture
Agricultural pest management studies
article

Profitability and cost-effectiveness of cowpea seed production and delivery systems: Evidence from Nigeria and Ghana

O. O. Ugbabe, Paul Aseete, Julius Manda, Abdulwahab S. Shaibu, A.Y. Kamara, Teryima Iorlamen, Bashiru Haruna, Oyakhilomen Oyinbo, Alpha Y Kamara, Abel Gomina, Lucky O Omoigui, Catherine Ragasa, Christopher O Ojiewo
article en

Abstract

Seed systems are critical to agricultural development in sub-Saharan Africa, where smallholder farmers rely on quality seeds to boost productivity, enhance food security, and increase income generation. Despite extensive research on seed systems, there is limited empirical evidence on the profitability of different legume seed production models, particularly how investment returns respond to potential price and yield shocks, and the cost-effectiveness of various seed delivery channels in West Africa. Using data from multiple actors in cowpea seed systems, this study assesses and compares the profitability of seed production under formal, semi-formal, and informal producers, as well as the cost-effectiveness of different seed delivery channels in Ghana and Nigeria. Our results show that while the formal seed production model involves higher investment costs, it also yields greater returns, on average, in terms of net revenues, contribution margin, and benefit–cost ratio, GH₵12,400 (1205 USD/ha), 66% and 2.9, respectively, in Ghana, and ₦1,127,000 (713 USD/ha), 63% and 2.7, respectively, in Nigeria. In contrast, the semi-formal and informal producers require lower capital outlay, yet they generate reasonable returns, on average, underscoring the complementary role of these models. Results also show that profitability varies across countries. In Ghana, formal, semi-formal, and informal producers outperformed their counterparts in Nigeria, highlighting the importance of country-specific context. Beyond average returns, we find that all production models are sensitive to seed price and yield fluctuations. Lastly, our results show that along the dimensions of per-farmer delivery cost and delivery cost per kilogram of seed, agrodealers appear to be among the most cost-effective in Nigeria, while community-based seed marketing appears to be the most cost-effective in Ghana. Overall, findings highlight policy opportunities to enhance cowpea seed production and distribution systems, towards ensuring that quality seeds are available, affordable, and accessible to smallholder farmers.

Outlook on Agriculture
Ahmadu Bello University (NG), International Food Policy Research Institute (US), Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz Y Trigo (MX), Royal University of Agriculture, Cambodia (KH), Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (GH), Obafemi Awolowo University (NG), Makerere University (UG), Bayero University Kano (NG)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Agricultural pest management studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.