From groups to a single league: evaluating competitiveness in the UEFA Champions League

Abstract Recently, UEFA changed the group stage of its international soccer competitions to an incomplete round robin tournament. Previously, teams were divided into groups, each playing a double round robin tournament with a resulting ranking table. In contrast, the new format has all teams competing in one league, producing a single ranking. We investigate the effect of the new format on the probability of competitive matches in the UEFA Champions League. A match is non-competitive if the prize for at least one opponent does not depend on the match outcome, or if there exists an opportunity for both opponents to collude; otherwise, we call a match competitive. Using Monte Carlo simulations and integer programming, we show that the new format results in proportionally more competitive matches than the old format, although it also results in a noticeable increase in the risk of collusion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/jqas-2025-0128
Primary Topic
Sports Analytics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From groups to a single league: evaluating competitiveness in the UEFA Champions League

Karel Devriesere, Dries Goossens, Frits Spieksma
Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports
Sports Analytics and Performance
article

From groups to a single league: evaluating competitiveness in the UEFA Champions League

Karel Devriesere, Dries Goossens, Frits Spieksma
article en

Abstract

Abstract Recently, UEFA changed the group stage of its international soccer competitions to an incomplete round robin tournament. Previously, teams were divided into groups, each playing a double round robin tournament with a resulting ranking table. In contrast, the new format has all teams competing in one league, producing a single ranking. We investigate the effect of the new format on the probability of competitive matches in the UEFA Champions League. A match is non-competitive if the prize for at least one opponent does not depend on the match outcome, or if there exists an opportunity for both opponents to collude; otherwise, we call a match competitive. Using Monte Carlo simulations and integer programming, we show that the new format results in proportionally more competitive matches than the old format, although it also results in a noticeable increase in the risk of collusion.

Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports
HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts (BE), Flanders Make (Belgium) (BE), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Vlaams Supercomputer Centrum, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Universiteit Gent, Vlaamse regering
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Sports Analytics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From groups to a single league: evaluating competitiveness in the UEFA Champions League — Karel Devriesere, Dries Goossens, et al. · Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS