Spectral and time-domain comparison of GNSS and accelerometer wave buoys

A comparison of spectral and time-domain wave observations collected by accelerometer-based Datawell Waverider and Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) based Sofar Spotter wave buoys is presented over nearly 24,000 hours at two sites in the Southern and Indian oceans. All buoy data were processed consistently using the raw displacement time series. Across integrated wave parameters derived from the spectrum, the observations show good agreement; however, based on the computed bias, the Spotter wave heights were slightly smaller at the Southern Ocean site (Datawell Waverider 4) and slightly larger at the Indian Ocean site (Datawell Waverider MkIII). The Waverider buoys showed more energy at frequencies higher than the peak and less at frequencies lower than the peak. The high and low-frequency ends of the spectrum also had different spectral shapes, reflecting the different band-pass filtering methods completed on-board each buoy. The Spotter buoys also consistently reported broader directional spreading. In the time domain, comparison of the significant wave height and mean period is similar to that of the spectral comparison. The Spotter buoys more frequently reported large (unphysical) zero-crossing individual wave heights. This behavior was able to be reproduced when the buoy was momentarily submerged, causing loss of the GNSS satellite signal. Similar to other studies, we also found that at both sites, the Waverider buoys recorded horizontal displacements larger than those recorded by the Spotter and expected by linear theory. Across our complete analysis, the two buoy types reported similar integrated statistics; however, differences emerged when assessing higher-order parameters. • Datawell Waverider and Sofar Spotter wave buoys are compared at two sites • Spectral and time-domain derived bulk-parameters are similar across both buoys • Differences emerge when assessing higher-order parameters • Loss of GNSS signal can result in erroneous displacements for the Spotter

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Coastal Engineering
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2026.105049
Primary Topic
Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spectral and time-domain comparison of GNSS and accelerometer wave buoys

Sohrab Boldaji, Ryan Lowe, Jeff E. Hansen, Matt Hatcher et al.
Coastal Engineering
Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
article

Spectral and time-domain comparison of GNSS and accelerometer wave buoys

Sohrab Boldaji, Ryan Lowe, Jeff E. Hansen, Matt Hatcher, Ian Young, Michael V. W. Cuttler, Daniel Ierodiaconou
article en

Abstract

A comparison of spectral and time-domain wave observations collected by accelerometer-based Datawell Waverider and Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) based Sofar Spotter wave buoys is presented over nearly 24,000 hours at two sites in the Southern and Indian oceans. All buoy data were processed consistently using the raw displacement time series. Across integrated wave parameters derived from the spectrum, the observations show good agreement; however, based on the computed bias, the Spotter wave heights were slightly smaller at the Southern Ocean site (Datawell Waverider 4) and slightly larger at the Indian Ocean site (Datawell Waverider MkIII). The Waverider buoys showed more energy at frequencies higher than the peak and less at frequencies lower than the peak. The high and low-frequency ends of the spectrum also had different spectral shapes, reflecting the different band-pass filtering methods completed on-board each buoy. The Spotter buoys also consistently reported broader directional spreading. In the time domain, comparison of the significant wave height and mean period is similar to that of the spectral comparison. The Spotter buoys more frequently reported large (unphysical) zero-crossing individual wave heights. This behavior was able to be reproduced when the buoy was momentarily submerged, causing loss of the GNSS satellite signal. Similar to other studies, we also found that at both sites, the Waverider buoys recorded horizontal displacements larger than those recorded by the Spotter and expected by linear theory. Across our complete analysis, the two buoy types reported similar integrated statistics; however, differences emerged when assessing higher-order parameters. • Datawell Waverider and Sofar Spotter wave buoys are compared at two sites • Spectral and time-domain derived bulk-parameters are similar across both buoys • Differences emerge when assessing higher-order parameters • Loss of GNSS signal can result in erroneous displacements for the Spotter

Coastal Engineering
Deakin University (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Ocean Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.