Trinitarian Categories and the Division of Nature in John Scottus Eriugena

Abstract Eriugena's rendering of creativity as the central ontological category must be understood in terms of his comprehension of the Trinity in terms of causa sui . Everything participates vertically in the divine self‐creation which is simultaneous with the creation of finite reality. Eriugena refigures the horizontal Aristotelian‐neoplatonic categories in terms of this vertical metaphysics. The apophatic discourse of ‘naming God’ linked to the latter unsettles the essentialism of categorisation. A re‐organising of the categories of finite being also now reflects the relationality and polar oscillation of the Trinitarian conception of the constitutive self‐creation of both God and (by participation) creatures. Conversely, the hierarchical degrees of Being are re‐thought in terms of degrees of sharing‐in and ascent to a Trinitarian horizontal levelling of effect with cause, outcome with origin, and (Christologically and eschatologically), Creation with Creator.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Modern Theology
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.70104
Primary Topic
Thoreau and American Literature
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trinitarian Categories and the Division of Nature in John Scottus Eriugena

John Milbank
Modern Theology
Thoreau and American Literature
article

Trinitarian Categories and the Division of Nature in John Scottus Eriugena

John Milbank
article en

Abstract

Abstract Eriugena's rendering of creativity as the central ontological category must be understood in terms of his comprehension of the Trinity in terms of causa sui . Everything participates vertically in the divine self‐creation which is simultaneous with the creation of finite reality. Eriugena refigures the horizontal Aristotelian‐neoplatonic categories in terms of this vertical metaphysics. The apophatic discourse of ‘naming God’ linked to the latter unsettles the essentialism of categorisation. A re‐organising of the categories of finite being also now reflects the relationality and polar oscillation of the Trinitarian conception of the constitutive self‐creation of both God and (by participation) creatures. Conversely, the hierarchical degrees of Being are re‐thought in terms of degrees of sharing‐in and ascent to a Trinitarian horizontal levelling of effect with cause, outcome with origin, and (Christologically and eschatologically), Creation with Creator.

Modern Theology
University of Nottingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Thoreau and American Literature
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Trinitarian Categories and the Division of Nature in John Scottus Eriugena — John Milbank · Modern Theology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS