Leveraging immune and clinicopathological profiles with machine learning to predict axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND: . METHODS: ). Three machine learning models were developed using the Random Forest algorithm: Model 1 included clinicopathological data from Dataset 1; Model 2 used clinicopathological and immune response data from Dataset 1; and Model 3 used clinicopathological data from Dataset 2. All models followed the same machine learning pipeline, including data pre-processing, feature selection using recursive feature elimination with cross-validation, algorithm optimization using random search cross-validation, and results interpretability using Shapley additive explanations values. After selecting the best-performing model, Model 4 was developed using its dataset and features. The optimal feature set was determined at the point where adding more features led to a decline in model performance metrics. RESULTS: was the most predictive feature, even surpassing tumor diameter, a well-established prognostic factor in breast cancer. Thus, it might stand as a novel biomarker candidate. CONCLUSIONS: This study not only identifies promising biomarker candidates but also highlights the importance of including mechanistic features, such as mediating inflammation, in breast cancer patient stratification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Breast Cancer Research
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-026-02294-9
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leveraging immune and clinicopathological profiles with machine learning to predict axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients

D. Mata Cano, Laia Reverté, Marylène Lejeune, Alessio Fiorin et al.
Breast Cancer Research
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Leveraging immune and clinicopathological profiles with machine learning to predict axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients

D. Mata Cano, Laia Reverté, Marylène Lejeune, Alessio Fiorin, Mikel Relloso Ortiz de Uriarte, Laia Adalid-Llansa, Elena Goyda, Tábata Sánchez-Alcántara, Alba Fischer-Carles, Ramon Bosch Príncep, Gemma Piella, Maria Ballester-Navarro, Jérôme Noailly, Noèlia Gallardo-Borràs, Carlos López Pablo, Esther Sauras-Colón
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: . METHODS: ). Three machine learning models were developed using the Random Forest algorithm: Model 1 included clinicopathological data from Dataset 1; Model 2 used clinicopathological and immune response data from Dataset 1; and Model 3 used clinicopathological data from Dataset 2. All models followed the same machine learning pipeline, including data pre-processing, feature selection using recursive feature elimination with cross-validation, algorithm optimization using random search cross-validation, and results interpretability using Shapley additive explanations values. After selecting the best-performing model, Model 4 was developed using its dataset and features. The optimal feature set was determined at the point where adding more features led to a decline in model performance metrics. RESULTS: was the most predictive feature, even surpassing tumor diameter, a well-established prognostic factor in breast cancer. Thus, it might stand as a novel biomarker candidate. CONCLUSIONS: This study not only identifies promising biomarker candidates but also highlights the importance of including mechanistic features, such as mediating inflammation, in breast cancer patient stratification.

Breast Cancer Research
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology (ES), Institut de Recerca en Energia de Catalunya (ES), Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona (ES), Hospital Universitari de Tortosa Verge de la Cinta (ES), Universitat Rovira i Virgili (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.