Randomized Controlled Study of Sirolimus-coated Balloons for Dysfunctional Hemodialysis Fistulas

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Introduction</h3> Restenosis following balloon angioplasty remains a major cause of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) dysfunction in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. We evaluated whether use of sirolimus-coated angioplasty balloons (SCB) improves access circuit primary patency (ACPP) in patients with dysfunctional, non-thrombosed AVFs. <h3>Methods</h3> This investigator-initiated, multicenter, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04409912) enrolled 170 patients from three tertiary teaching hospitals in Singapore. Patients with dysfunctional AVFs, including those with single or multiple stenotic lesions within the access circuit, were included. Following successful plain balloon angioplasty (<30% residual stenosis on digital subtraction angiography), patients were randomly assigned using a centralized web-based system to receive additional treatment with SCB (n=83) or placebo balloons (n=87). During the 12-month follow-up, patients and managing physicians were blinded. The proceduralists and coordinators could not be blinded because of visible differences between the balloons. The primary endpoint was ACPP during the first 6 months after the index procedure. Secondary endpoints included 12-month patency and safety outcomes. <h3>Results</h3> In both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, 6-month ACPP was significantly higher in the SCB group compared with the placebo group (p=0.03). At 6 months, 70.1% (95% CI, 58.7–78.8) of patients treated with SCB remained patent, compared with 56.7% (95% CI, 45.5–66.4) in the placebo group. At 12 months, the difference in patency was not statistically significant in the intention-to-treat analysis (37.1% vs. 27.7%; p=0.07) but remained significant in the per-protocol analysis (36.4% vs. 25.2%; p=0.04). Adverse events were infrequent and no deaths occurred within 30 days in both groups. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Use of SCB following successful plain balloon angioplasty improved 6-month ACPP in patients with dysfunctional AVFs, including those with multiple stenotic lesions. Short-term safety findings were reassuring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kidney International Reports
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2026.106583
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Randomized Controlled Study of Sirolimus-coated Balloons for Dysfunctional Hemodialysis Fistulas

R K Tan, Kun Da Zhuang, Kiang Hiong Tay, Kalpana Vijaykumar et al.
Kidney International Reports
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Randomized Controlled Study of Sirolimus-coated Balloons for Dysfunctional Hemodialysis Fistulas

R K Tan, Kun Da Zhuang, Kiang Hiong Tay, Kalpana Vijaykumar, Chee Wooi Tan, Alvin T’ng, Gek Hsiang Lim, Darius Aw Kang Lie, Edward Choke, Jun Jie Ng, Tze Tec Chong, Chieh Suai Tan, Suh Chien Pang, Pei Ho, Hsien Ts’ung Tay
article en

Abstract

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Introduction</h3> Restenosis following balloon angioplasty remains a major cause of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) dysfunction in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. We evaluated whether use of sirolimus-coated angioplasty balloons (SCB) improves access circuit primary patency (ACPP) in patients with dysfunctional, non-thrombosed AVFs. <h3>Methods</h3> This investigator-initiated, multicenter, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04409912) enrolled 170 patients from three tertiary teaching hospitals in Singapore. Patients with dysfunctional AVFs, including those with single or multiple stenotic lesions within the access circuit, were included. Following successful plain balloon angioplasty (<30% residual stenosis on digital subtraction angiography), patients were randomly assigned using a centralized web-based system to receive additional treatment with SCB (n=83) or placebo balloons (n=87). During the 12-month follow-up, patients and managing physicians were blinded. The proceduralists and coordinators could not be blinded because of visible differences between the balloons. The primary endpoint was ACPP during the first 6 months after the index procedure. Secondary endpoints included 12-month patency and safety outcomes. <h3>Results</h3> In both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, 6-month ACPP was significantly higher in the SCB group compared with the placebo group (p=0.03). At 6 months, 70.1% (95% CI, 58.7–78.8) of patients treated with SCB remained patent, compared with 56.7% (95% CI, 45.5–66.4) in the placebo group. At 12 months, the difference in patency was not statistically significant in the intention-to-treat analysis (37.1% vs. 27.7%; p=0.07) but remained significant in the per-protocol analysis (36.4% vs. 25.2%; p=0.04). Adverse events were infrequent and no deaths occurred within 30 days in both groups. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Use of SCB following successful plain balloon angioplasty improved 6-month ACPP in patients with dysfunctional AVFs, including those with multiple stenotic lesions. Short-term safety findings were reassuring.

Kidney International Reports
National University of Singapore (SG), Singapore General Hospital (SG), University Health System (US), Sengkang General Hospital (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.