Post-selection inference for quantifying uncertainty in changes in variance : Post-selection inference for quantifying uncertainty in changes..

Quantifying uncertainty in detected changepoints is an important problem. However it is challenging as the naive approach would use the data twice, first to detect the changes, and then to test them. This will bias the test, and can lead to anti-conservative p-values. One approach to avoid this is to use ideas from post-selection inference, which conditions on the information in the data used to choose which changes to test. As a result this produces valid p-values; that is, p-values that have a uniform distribution if there is no change. Currently such methods have been developed for detecting changes in mean only. This paper presents two approaches for constructing post-selection p-values for detecting changes in variance. These vary depending on the method used to detect the changes, but are general in terms of being applicable for a range of change-detection methods and a range of hypotheses that we may wish to test.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)
Published
2026-06-30
Primary Topic
Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Post-selection inference for quantifying uncertainty in changes in variance : Post-selection inference for quantifying uncertainty in changes..

Rachel Carrington, Paul Fearnhead
Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)
Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
article

Post-selection inference for quantifying uncertainty in changes in variance : Post-selection inference for quantifying uncertainty in changes..

Rachel Carrington, Paul Fearnhead
article en

Abstract

Quantifying uncertainty in detected changepoints is an important problem. However it is challenging as the naive approach would use the data twice, first to detect the changes, and then to test them. This will bias the test, and can lead to anti-conservative p-values. One approach to avoid this is to use ideas from post-selection inference, which conditions on the information in the data used to choose which changes to test. As a result this produces valid p-values; that is, p-values that have a uniform distribution if there is no change. Currently such methods have been developed for detecting changes in mean only. This paper presents two approaches for constructing post-selection p-values for detecting changes in variance. These vary depending on the method used to detect the changes, but are general in terms of being applicable for a range of change-detection methods and a range of hypotheses that we may wish to test.

Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.