The Use of Machine Learning in Emergency Care Units: A Systematic Review

Emergency departments (EDs) are critical points of entry in healthcare systems where timely and accurate decision-making is vital. Machine learning (ML) offers promising capabilities to enhance patient triage, optimize resource allocation, and improve clinical outcomes in these high-pressure environments. This systematic review investigates the application of ML in EDs, identifies commonly used algorithms and tools, examines their limitations, and provides recommendations for improvement. A structured literature search was conducted across 5 major databases: Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and PubMed, yielding 1257 peer-reviewed articles. Studies were included if they were published between 2017 and 2024, written in English, and focused on ML applications in EDs within the fields of Computer Science, Engineering, Decision Science, or Mathematics. Exclusion criteria eliminated articles under 6 pages, inaccessible full texts, non-ML-focused studies, and publications such as proposals, abstracts, or book reviews. After screening and quality assessment by 2 independent reviewers, 27 studies were selected for in-depth analysis. Of these, 88.9% were journal articles, 7.4% book chapters, and 3.7% conference proceedings. Findings reveal that the various ML algorithms applied in EDs are context-dependent and use various evaluation metrics, while tools for data extraction and analysis include Python, Keras, TensorFlow, SQL, MATLAB, RStudio, and IBM SPSS. The identified limitations involved data complexity, model accuracy, lack of generalizability, and incomplete datasets. Recommendations across studies emphasized the need to broaden data sources, integrate additional predictors, and improve algorithmic comparisons. This review contributes to the growing body of knowledge on ML in emergency care by synthesizing current practices, highlighting critical challenges, and offering practical directions for future research and implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Primary Care & Community Health
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319251414821
Primary Topic
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Use of Machine Learning in Emergency Care Units: A Systematic Review

Patrick Ndayizigamiye, Tebogo Makaba, Lizzy Ofusori, Jennifer Nkhwashu
Journal of Primary Care & Community Health
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
article

The Use of Machine Learning in Emergency Care Units: A Systematic Review

Patrick Ndayizigamiye, Tebogo Makaba, Lizzy Ofusori, Jennifer Nkhwashu
article en

Abstract

Emergency departments (EDs) are critical points of entry in healthcare systems where timely and accurate decision-making is vital. Machine learning (ML) offers promising capabilities to enhance patient triage, optimize resource allocation, and improve clinical outcomes in these high-pressure environments. This systematic review investigates the application of ML in EDs, identifies commonly used algorithms and tools, examines their limitations, and provides recommendations for improvement. A structured literature search was conducted across 5 major databases: Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and PubMed, yielding 1257 peer-reviewed articles. Studies were included if they were published between 2017 and 2024, written in English, and focused on ML applications in EDs within the fields of Computer Science, Engineering, Decision Science, or Mathematics. Exclusion criteria eliminated articles under 6 pages, inaccessible full texts, non-ML-focused studies, and publications such as proposals, abstracts, or book reviews. After screening and quality assessment by 2 independent reviewers, 27 studies were selected for in-depth analysis. Of these, 88.9% were journal articles, 7.4% book chapters, and 3.7% conference proceedings. Findings reveal that the various ML algorithms applied in EDs are context-dependent and use various evaluation metrics, while tools for data extraction and analysis include Python, Keras, TensorFlow, SQL, MATLAB, RStudio, and IBM SPSS. The identified limitations involved data complexity, model accuracy, lack of generalizability, and incomplete datasets. Recommendations across studies emphasized the need to broaden data sources, integrate additional predictors, and improve algorithmic comparisons. This review contributes to the growing body of knowledge on ML in emergency care by synthesizing current practices, highlighting critical challenges, and offering practical directions for future research and implementation.

Journal of Primary Care & Community HealthVol. 17
University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.