Environmental impact of total hip replacements: a life cycle assessment study

OBJECTIVES: Healthcare contributes considerably to greenhouse gas emissions, particularly from operating theatres. The global demand for total hip replacements (THR) is rising, highlighting the need to understand its impact on the environment. The study aims to assess the environmental impact of THRs using life cycle assessment (LCA) and to identify key contributors. DESIGN: A process-based LCA focusing on the surgical procedure was conducted in accordance with global standards (ISO 14040:2006 and ISO 14044:2006). Eleven sensitivity scenarios were performed to assess the robustness of the results. SETTING: A Danish University Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The empirical data involved the quantity and type of surgical equipment, material composition, energy usage and clinical infrastructure. There were no study participants. INTERVENTIONS: No study interventions were performed. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: 18 environmental impact scores, such as global warming, human toxicity and water consumption, were assessed. RESULTS: e, with major contributors being single-use disposable utensils (54 %), implants (22 %), and sterilisation of non-disposable utensils (18 %). Operating theatre energy usage, non-disposable utensils and clinical infrastructure contributed less, at 3 %, 2 % and 1 % each. Although the results of the other 17 environmental impact scores varied, they were predominantly influenced by the same factors as the carbon footprint. The sensitivity analysis showed that the overall carbon footprint varied by no more than 6 % unless the energy system shifted to less renewable energy, potentially increasing the footprint by 47 %. CONCLUSION: THRs impose a substantial environmental burden, and sustainable solutions should focus on the primary drivers of this impact: disposable utensils, implants and the sterilisation process. In contrast, clinical infrastructure and non-disposable utensils appear to have a relatively minimal environmental impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Open
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109563
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental impact of total hip replacements: a life cycle assessment study

Michael Zwicky Hauschild, Stig Brorson, Katarzyna Dudka, Anna Roe Rasmussen
BMJ Open
Climate Change and Health Impacts
article

Environmental impact of total hip replacements: a life cycle assessment study

Michael Zwicky Hauschild, Stig Brorson, Katarzyna Dudka, Anna Roe Rasmussen
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Healthcare contributes considerably to greenhouse gas emissions, particularly from operating theatres. The global demand for total hip replacements (THR) is rising, highlighting the need to understand its impact on the environment. The study aims to assess the environmental impact of THRs using life cycle assessment (LCA) and to identify key contributors. DESIGN: A process-based LCA focusing on the surgical procedure was conducted in accordance with global standards (ISO 14040:2006 and ISO 14044:2006). Eleven sensitivity scenarios were performed to assess the robustness of the results. SETTING: A Danish University Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The empirical data involved the quantity and type of surgical equipment, material composition, energy usage and clinical infrastructure. There were no study participants. INTERVENTIONS: No study interventions were performed. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: 18 environmental impact scores, such as global warming, human toxicity and water consumption, were assessed. RESULTS: e, with major contributors being single-use disposable utensils (54 %), implants (22 %), and sterilisation of non-disposable utensils (18 %). Operating theatre energy usage, non-disposable utensils and clinical infrastructure contributed less, at 3 %, 2 % and 1 % each. Although the results of the other 17 environmental impact scores varied, they were predominantly influenced by the same factors as the carbon footprint. The sensitivity analysis showed that the overall carbon footprint varied by no more than 6 % unless the energy system shifted to less renewable energy, potentially increasing the footprint by 47 %. CONCLUSION: THRs impose a substantial environmental burden, and sustainable solutions should focus on the primary drivers of this impact: disposable utensils, implants and the sterilisation process. In contrast, clinical infrastructure and non-disposable utensils appear to have a relatively minimal environmental impact.

BMJ OpenVol. 16(5)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Zealand University Hospital (DK), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.