Impact of European Association of Urology Combination and Platinum Eligibility on Real‐World Treatment Sequences and Survival in Japanese Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence of European Association of Urology-defined combination and platinum eligibility at first-line treatment initiation, and to assess their impact on conventional treatment sequence and overall survival in a real-world Japanese cohort. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 148 patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma who initiated systemic chemotherapy between 2018 and 2024 at a single institution in Japan. Cisplatin eligibility was assessed according to the Galsky criteria. Combination therapy eligibility and platinum eligibility were defined according to the European Association of Urology guideline. RESULTS: Among the 148 patients, 128 (86.5%) were combination-eligible and 20 (13.5%) ineligible. Among combination-eligible patients, 70 (54.7%) were cisplatin-eligible, 47 (36.7%) cisplatin-ineligible but platinum-eligible, and 11 (8.6%) platinum-ineligible. Median overall survival was significantly longer in combination-eligible patients than in combination-ineligible patients (25 vs. 16 months, p = 0.019, HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.16-5.23). Within the combination-eligible group, cisplatin-eligible patients tended to show superior median overall survival (not reached) compared with cisplatin-ineligible/platinum-eligible (25 months) and platinum-ineligible (15 months, p = 0.11 and p = 0.082, respectively). Only 25.0% (32/128) of combination-eligible patients received the chemotherapy-immune checkpoint inhibitor-enfortumab vedotin sequence, while 20.0% (4/20) of combination-ineligible patients also completed this sequence. CONCLUSIONS: European Association of Urology-defined combination and platinum eligibility were associated with survival outcomes and treatment sequence capability in a real-world setting. These findings highlight the prognostic value but practical limitations of eligibility criteria, emphasizing the need to develop more practical classification frameworks that ensure broader access to effective therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Urology
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.70403
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of European Association of Urology Combination and Platinum Eligibility on Real‐World Treatment Sequences and Survival in Japanese Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

Kozaburo Tanuma, Akane Yamaguchi, Atsushi Ikeda, Yoshiyuki Nagumo et al.
International Journal of Urology
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
article

Impact of European Association of Urology Combination and Platinum Eligibility on Real‐World Treatment Sequences and Survival in Japanese Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

Kozaburo Tanuma, Akane Yamaguchi, Atsushi Ikeda, Yoshiyuki Nagumo, Satoshi Nitta, Kazuki Hamada, Takashi Kawahara, Hiroyuki Nishiyama, Masanobu Shiga, Shuya Kandori, Akio Hoshi
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence of European Association of Urology-defined combination and platinum eligibility at first-line treatment initiation, and to assess their impact on conventional treatment sequence and overall survival in a real-world Japanese cohort. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 148 patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma who initiated systemic chemotherapy between 2018 and 2024 at a single institution in Japan. Cisplatin eligibility was assessed according to the Galsky criteria. Combination therapy eligibility and platinum eligibility were defined according to the European Association of Urology guideline. RESULTS: Among the 148 patients, 128 (86.5%) were combination-eligible and 20 (13.5%) ineligible. Among combination-eligible patients, 70 (54.7%) were cisplatin-eligible, 47 (36.7%) cisplatin-ineligible but platinum-eligible, and 11 (8.6%) platinum-ineligible. Median overall survival was significantly longer in combination-eligible patients than in combination-ineligible patients (25 vs. 16 months, p = 0.019, HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.16-5.23). Within the combination-eligible group, cisplatin-eligible patients tended to show superior median overall survival (not reached) compared with cisplatin-ineligible/platinum-eligible (25 months) and platinum-ineligible (15 months, p = 0.11 and p = 0.082, respectively). Only 25.0% (32/128) of combination-eligible patients received the chemotherapy-immune checkpoint inhibitor-enfortumab vedotin sequence, while 20.0% (4/20) of combination-ineligible patients also completed this sequence. CONCLUSIONS: European Association of Urology-defined combination and platinum eligibility were associated with survival outcomes and treatment sequence capability in a real-world setting. These findings highlight the prognostic value but practical limitations of eligibility criteria, emphasizing the need to develop more practical classification frameworks that ensure broader access to effective therapy.

International Journal of UrologyVol. 33(5)
University of Tsukuba (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.