How does soil depth vary in semiarid central India? Insights from machine learning–based mapping for crop management

Accurate soil depth information is critical for sustainable crop planning in semiarid regions, where water availability and rooting depth directly influence agricultural productivity. Despite the growing application of machine learning (ML) techniques in digital soil mapping, a clear quantitative assessment of their performance relative to conventional soil mapping approaches is still lacking, particularly in the Central India where soil variability is high and data scarcity is common. This study addresses these gaps by evaluating four ML algorithms, Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Cubist, for soil depth prediction in Yavatmal district, Maharashtra (∼13,601 km 2 ). A total of 655 geo-referenced soil profile was collected and used alongside 32 environmental covariates. The XGB produced the highest depth (10–183 cm), followed by Cubist (1.5–178 cm) and RF (11–146 cm). NDVI consistently emerged as the most influential predictor. Model performance was evaluated using independent validation, where RF yielded the highest R 2 (0.43) followed by Cubist (R 2 = 0.39), XGB (R 2 = 0.38), and SVR (R 2 = 0.34). Prediction interval maps (90% confidence) were also generated to quantify model uncertainty. The comparison between conventional and digital mapping revealed that, in digital mapping, the areas of shallow (25–50 cm) and moderately shallow (50–75 cm) soil classes increased by 79.85% and 48.33%, respectively, compared to conventional mapping. The resulting soil depth maps were linked with agronomic planning. These data-driven outputs offer a valuable tool for spatially targeted soil management and precision agriculture in semiarid regions. • ML models improved soil depth mapping accuracy over conventional methods • NDVI and terrain factors were key drivers of soil depth variability • Soil depth maps support site-specific crop planning in semiarid regions

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth Critical Zone
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecz.2026.100080
Primary Topic
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How does soil depth vary in semiarid central India? Insights from machine learning–based mapping for crop management

Sirisha Adamala, Abhay Omprakash Shirale, Pravash Chandra Moharana, Ranjan Paul et al.
Earth Critical Zone
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
article

How does soil depth vary in semiarid central India? Insights from machine learning–based mapping for crop management

Sirisha Adamala, Abhay Omprakash Shirale, Pravash Chandra Moharana, Ranjan Paul, K. Karthikeyan, Mahendra Singh Raghuwanshi, Sudipta Chattaraj, Buddaraju Amrutha, H Biswas, N G Patil, Ram Prasad Sharma, Nirmal Kumar, Ravindra Naitam, Preeti Deshmukh
article en

Abstract

Accurate soil depth information is critical for sustainable crop planning in semiarid regions, where water availability and rooting depth directly influence agricultural productivity. Despite the growing application of machine learning (ML) techniques in digital soil mapping, a clear quantitative assessment of their performance relative to conventional soil mapping approaches is still lacking, particularly in the Central India where soil variability is high and data scarcity is common. This study addresses these gaps by evaluating four ML algorithms, Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Cubist, for soil depth prediction in Yavatmal district, Maharashtra (∼13,601 km 2 ). A total of 655 geo-referenced soil profile was collected and used alongside 32 environmental covariates. The XGB produced the highest depth (10–183 cm), followed by Cubist (1.5–178 cm) and RF (11–146 cm). NDVI consistently emerged as the most influential predictor. Model performance was evaluated using independent validation, where RF yielded the highest R 2 (0.43) followed by Cubist (R 2 = 0.39), XGB (R 2 = 0.38), and SVR (R 2 = 0.34). Prediction interval maps (90% confidence) were also generated to quantify model uncertainty. The comparison between conventional and digital mapping revealed that, in digital mapping, the areas of shallow (25–50 cm) and moderately shallow (50–75 cm) soil classes increased by 79.85% and 48.33%, respectively, compared to conventional mapping. The resulting soil depth maps were linked with agronomic planning. These data-driven outputs offer a valuable tool for spatially targeted soil management and precision agriculture in semiarid regions. • ML models improved soil depth mapping accuracy over conventional methods • NDVI and terrain factors were key drivers of soil depth variability • Soil depth maps support site-specific crop planning in semiarid regions

Earth Critical Zone
Defence Institute of Advanced Technology (IN), Central Institute for Cotton Research (IN), ICAR-National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning (IN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.