Efficacy of injection sclerotherapy versus rubber band ligation for grades I–III internal hemorrhoids: A systematic review and meta-analysis

To compare injection sclerotherapy (IS) versus rubber band ligation (RBL) for grades I–III internal hemorrhoids regarding treatment effectiveness, patient satisfaction, recurrence, and postoperative pain. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and major Chinese databases were searched up to November 2025 for comparative studies. Pooled risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using random-effects models. Eleven studies (2235 patients) were included. IS and RBL showed no significant differences in treatment effectiveness (RR = 1.01, 95%CI 0.96–1.06, P = 0.681) or patient satisfaction (RR = 0.88, 95%CI 0.74–1.06, P = 0.171). However, IS was associated with significantly higher recurrence (RR = 1.51, 95%CI 1.07–2.12, P = 0.012) but lower moderate-to-severe postoperative pain (RR = 0.20, 95%CI 0.06–0.70, P = 0.002). Sensitivity analyses confirmed robust findings for effectiveness and pain; recurrence results lacked robustness and require cautious interpretation due to limited studies and inconsistent follow-up. IS and RBL offer comparable effectiveness. IS provides superior pain control, while RBL may confer lower recurrence risk, though this finding remains uncertain. Treatment selection should prioritize predominant symptoms (bleeding vs. prolapse) and patient preferences over hemorrhoidal grade alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Surgery
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2026.04.100
Primary Topic
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of injection sclerotherapy versus rubber band ligation for grades I–III internal hemorrhoids: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Jiang Liu, Huafeng Jiang, Minxia Shan
Asian Journal of Surgery
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
article

Efficacy of injection sclerotherapy versus rubber band ligation for grades I–III internal hemorrhoids: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Jiang Liu, Huafeng Jiang, Minxia Shan
article en

Abstract

To compare injection sclerotherapy (IS) versus rubber band ligation (RBL) for grades I–III internal hemorrhoids regarding treatment effectiveness, patient satisfaction, recurrence, and postoperative pain. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and major Chinese databases were searched up to November 2025 for comparative studies. Pooled risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using random-effects models. Eleven studies (2235 patients) were included. IS and RBL showed no significant differences in treatment effectiveness (RR = 1.01, 95%CI 0.96–1.06, P = 0.681) or patient satisfaction (RR = 0.88, 95%CI 0.74–1.06, P = 0.171). However, IS was associated with significantly higher recurrence (RR = 1.51, 95%CI 1.07–2.12, P = 0.012) but lower moderate-to-severe postoperative pain (RR = 0.20, 95%CI 0.06–0.70, P = 0.002). Sensitivity analyses confirmed robust findings for effectiveness and pain; recurrence results lacked robustness and require cautious interpretation due to limited studies and inconsistent follow-up. IS and RBL offer comparable effectiveness. IS provides superior pain control, while RBL may confer lower recurrence risk, though this finding remains uncertain. Treatment selection should prioritize predominant symptoms (bleeding vs. prolapse) and patient preferences over hemorrhoidal grade alone.

Asian Journal of Surgery
Shaoxing People's Hospital (CN)
Chinese Medicine Research Program of Zhejiang Province
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.