From Graphene Oxidation to Structural Defects: The Role of Interlayer Spacing and <i>sp</i> <sup>3</sup> Hybridization in Lithium‐Ion Battery Anodes

Carbon‐based anodes remain central to lithium‐ion battery development, yet the relationship between oxidation state, structural disorder, and lithium‐ion transport kinetics is still incompletely understood. Here, we systematically compare commercial graphite (GPH), graphene oxide (GO), and exfoliated graphene (EGPN) as anode materials, combining morphological (scanning electron microscopy [SEM]), structural (X‐ray diffraction [XRD]), and chemical (X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy [XPS]) characterization with an evaluation of electrochemical performance. Our results reveal that oxidation degree governs a fundamental trade‐off: insufficient oxidation, as in GPH, limits interlayer spacing and constrains Li + transport, while excessive oxidation, as in GO, introduces sp 3 ‐rich domains and oxygen‐containing functional groups that impede both electronic conductivity and ionic mobility. EGPN occupies a productive middle ground; its moderate surface functionalization and expanded interlayer spacing collectively enhance solid‐state and interfacial Li + diffusivity by up to two orders of magnitude relative to GO, enabling a specific capacity of 165 mAh g −1 at 1C with lower polarization losses. These findings demonstrate that electrochemical performance in carbon anodes is not simply a function of surface area or defect density, but of achieving an optimal balance between sp 2 conductivity and controlled functionalization, a design principle with direct implications for next‐generation, high‐rate carbon anode materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Batteries & Supercaps
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/batt.70316
Primary Topic
Advancements in Battery Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Graphene Oxidation to Structural Defects: The Role of Interlayer Spacing and sp 3 Hybridization in Lithium‐Ion Battery Anodes

Francisco J. Garcia-Soriano, Esteban Euti, M. Victoria Bracamonte, Fernando P. Cometto et al.
Batteries & Supercaps
Advancements in Battery Materials
article

From Graphene Oxidation to Structural Defects: The Role of Interlayer Spacing and sp 3 Hybridization in Lithium‐Ion Battery Anodes

Francisco J. Garcia-Soriano, Esteban Euti, M. Victoria Bracamonte, Fernando P. Cometto, Dania Hernández, Ezequiel P. M. Leiva
article en

Abstract

Carbon‐based anodes remain central to lithium‐ion battery development, yet the relationship between oxidation state, structural disorder, and lithium‐ion transport kinetics is still incompletely understood. Here, we systematically compare commercial graphite (GPH), graphene oxide (GO), and exfoliated graphene (EGPN) as anode materials, combining morphological (scanning electron microscopy [SEM]), structural (X‐ray diffraction [XRD]), and chemical (X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy [XPS]) characterization with an evaluation of electrochemical performance. Our results reveal that oxidation degree governs a fundamental trade‐off: insufficient oxidation, as in GPH, limits interlayer spacing and constrains Li + transport, while excessive oxidation, as in GO, introduces sp 3 ‐rich domains and oxygen‐containing functional groups that impede both electronic conductivity and ionic mobility. EGPN occupies a productive middle ground; its moderate surface functionalization and expanded interlayer spacing collectively enhance solid‐state and interfacial Li + diffusivity by up to two orders of magnitude relative to GO, enabling a specific capacity of 165 mAh g −1 at 1C with lower polarization losses. These findings demonstrate that electrochemical performance in carbon anodes is not simply a function of surface area or defect density, but of achieving an optimal balance between sp 2 conductivity and controlled functionalization, a design principle with direct implications for next‐generation, high‐rate carbon anode materials.

Batteries & SupercapsVol. 9(5)
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (AR), Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México (MX), National Institute of Biology (SI), National Education Institute of the Republic of Slovenia (SI), National Institute of Chemistry (SI), Cordoba University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Advancements in Battery Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.