Whose Research Is It? Knowledge Creation With and for Adult Children of Survivors of the Genocide Against the Tutsi

Decolonial practices in bioanthropology have led to a shift toward intentional community engagement to inform the questions asked and the methods used, moving from "research on" to "research with". Specifically, in our work with survivors of the genocide against the Tutsi, we have grappled with how to develop contextually and culturally adequate research processes that prioritize community ways of knowing in the context of intense, widescale trauma and tragedy. In this self-reflexive narrative, we describe and reflect upon two stages of studies working with adult children of survivors of the genocide against the Tutsi. We provide the context of such work within the discipline of biological anthropology, and discuss the identities and relationships of the research team. The paper then shifts to a first-person narrative by the first author, the Rwandan insider/outsider leader of the project, describing its evolution from investigator-led observational quasi-experimental research into integrative community-based participatory research, detailing the ways in which engagement with the community has led to new questions and methodological approaches as the project continues to grow collaboratively. Rather than providing prescriptive guidelines for others committed to decolonizing their research programs, we use our experience to illustrate how such approaches necessarily vary across contexts and to highlight the importance of continued flexibility, reflexivity, and respect for community.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.70259
Primary Topic
Race, Genetics, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Whose Research Is It? Knowledge Creation With and for Adult Children of Survivors of the Genocide Against the Tutsi

Glorieuse Uwizeye, Julienne N. Rutherford, Zaneta M. Thayer
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
Race, Genetics, and Society
article

Whose Research Is It? Knowledge Creation With and for Adult Children of Survivors of the Genocide Against the Tutsi

Glorieuse Uwizeye, Julienne N. Rutherford, Zaneta M. Thayer
article en

Abstract

Decolonial practices in bioanthropology have led to a shift toward intentional community engagement to inform the questions asked and the methods used, moving from "research on" to "research with". Specifically, in our work with survivors of the genocide against the Tutsi, we have grappled with how to develop contextually and culturally adequate research processes that prioritize community ways of knowing in the context of intense, widescale trauma and tragedy. In this self-reflexive narrative, we describe and reflect upon two stages of studies working with adult children of survivors of the genocide against the Tutsi. We provide the context of such work within the discipline of biological anthropology, and discuss the identities and relationships of the research team. The paper then shifts to a first-person narrative by the first author, the Rwandan insider/outsider leader of the project, describing its evolution from investigator-led observational quasi-experimental research into integrative community-based participatory research, detailing the ways in which engagement with the community has led to new questions and methodological approaches as the project continues to grow collaboratively. Rather than providing prescriptive guidelines for others committed to decolonizing their research programs, we use our experience to illustrate how such approaches necessarily vary across contexts and to highlight the importance of continued flexibility, reflexivity, and respect for community.

American Journal of Biological AnthropologyVol. 190(1)
Dartmouth College (US), Western University (CA), University of Arizona (US)
University of Illinois at Chicago, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Race, Genetics, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.