The Impact of the SEC’s Office of Minority and Women Inclusion: Evidence from the Filing Review Process

ABSTRACT We examine the impact of the SEC’s Office of Minority and Women Inclusion (OMWI) on the role of employee gender in the Division of Corporation Finance’s filing review process. Gender bias theory suggests that women may work harder to compensate for perceived bias and discrimination. Consistent with this theory, we find that women reviewers issue longer comment letters, raise more issues, ask more accounting-specific questions, reference more authoritative guidance, request more filing amendments, follow up on more issues from prior rounds, and take longer to close the comment letter process. We also find that women are less prevalent in higher paygrades and leadership positions. These gender differences attenuate after the establishment of OMWI in 2011, but significant differences remain. Analyses of SEC employee survey data corroborate our comment letter results. Data Availability: All data are publicly available. JEL Classifications: G18; J16; M48.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Accounting Review
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2023-0649
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of the SEC’s Office of Minority and Women Inclusion: Evidence from the Filing Review Process

Matthew Kubic, Ling Lei Lisic, Mengmeng Wang, Bret A. Johnson
The Accounting Review
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

The Impact of the SEC’s Office of Minority and Women Inclusion: Evidence from the Filing Review Process

Matthew Kubic, Ling Lei Lisic, Mengmeng Wang, Bret A. Johnson
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT We examine the impact of the SEC’s Office of Minority and Women Inclusion (OMWI) on the role of employee gender in the Division of Corporation Finance’s filing review process. Gender bias theory suggests that women may work harder to compensate for perceived bias and discrimination. Consistent with this theory, we find that women reviewers issue longer comment letters, raise more issues, ask more accounting-specific questions, reference more authoritative guidance, request more filing amendments, follow up on more issues from prior rounds, and take longer to close the comment letter process. We also find that women are less prevalent in higher paygrades and leadership positions. These gender differences attenuate after the establishment of OMWI in 2011, but significant differences remain. Analyses of SEC employee survey data corroborate our comment letter results. Data Availability: All data are publicly available. JEL Classifications: G18; J16; M48.

The Accounting Review
George Mason University (US), University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US), Virginia Tech (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.