Empirical Scaling Relationships Between Fault Length and Throw‐Rates Modulated by Fault Interactions in Extensional Regimes

Abstract Throw rates of active faults are expected to scale with fault length because the geometric moment of a fault is directly related to its dimensions. However, empirical data sets commonly display substantial scatter, which limits the use of fault scaling relationships for seismic hazard assessment and for understanding the mechanics of continental deformation. Here we compile and investigate throw‐rate versus fault‐length data sets from three extensional regions in Italy characterized by progressively increasing numbers of active faults across strike. For each region, we quantify the strength and scatter of the scaling relationship using multiple statistical metrics, including R 2 , RMSE, and SSE. Our results show that the strength of the correlation systematically decreases and scatter increases as the number of across‐strike faults increases. This pattern is robust across statistical measures and is not significantly affected by uncertainties in fault length or throw‐rate estimation over Holocene to Late Quaternary timescales. We interpret these observations as evidence that fault interaction within densely faulted systems plays a first‐order role in controlling throw‐rate variability. These findings have important implications for the application of fault scaling relationships to seismic hazard assessment and for models of strain partitioning in continental extensional settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tectonics
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025tc009001
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Empirical Scaling Relationships Between Fault Length and Throw‐Rates Modulated by Fault Interactions in Extensional Regimes

M.D. Barberio, P. Randazzo, J. Robertson, J Geoffrey Walker et al.
Tectonics
earthquake and tectonic studies
article

Empirical Scaling Relationships Between Fault Length and Throw‐Rates Modulated by Fault Interactions in Extensional Regimes

M.D. Barberio, P. Randazzo, J. Robertson, J Geoffrey Walker, C. Sgambato, M. Meschis, F. Livio, A. M. Michetti, A. Gattuso, G. P. Roberts, A. Caracausi, Z. K. Mildon, F. Iezzi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Throw rates of active faults are expected to scale with fault length because the geometric moment of a fault is directly related to its dimensions. However, empirical data sets commonly display substantial scatter, which limits the use of fault scaling relationships for seismic hazard assessment and for understanding the mechanics of continental deformation. Here we compile and investigate throw‐rate versus fault‐length data sets from three extensional regions in Italy characterized by progressively increasing numbers of active faults across strike. For each region, we quantify the strength and scatter of the scaling relationship using multiple statistical metrics, including R 2 , RMSE, and SSE. Our results show that the strength of the correlation systematically decreases and scatter increases as the number of across‐strike faults increases. This pattern is robust across statistical measures and is not significantly affected by uncertainties in fault length or throw‐rate estimation over Holocene to Late Quaternary timescales. We interpret these observations as evidence that fault interaction within densely faulted systems plays a first‐order role in controlling throw‐rate variability. These findings have important implications for the application of fault scaling relationships to seismic hazard assessment and for models of strain partitioning in continental extensional settings.

TectonicsVol. 45(5)
University of Insubria (IT), Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (IT), Federico II University Hospital (IT), University College London (GB), University of Naples Federico II (IT), University of Plymouth (GB), Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Natural Environment Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
earthquake and tectonic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.