Temporal Dynamics of Eyewitness Memory: Evidence for a Multiphase Forgetting Curve From Minutes to Months

ABSTRACT Eyewitness testimony is central to criminal investigations, yet facial identification accuracy varies as a function of retention interval. This study examined eyewitness identification performance across delays ranging from 1 min to 90 days in two experiments. Participants viewed a target face and later completed lineup identification tasks following varying intervals. Results revealed a non‐monotonic, three‐phase forgetting trajectory: a rapid decline within the first hour, a period of relative stability between 1 h and 1 day and a more gradual decline extending to 90 days. The early and late phases were well described by logarithmic functions, whereas the intermediate phase showed a near‐zero gradient, indicating a temporary plateau in performance. The primary contribution of this work is a detailed characterisation of the shape of the forgetting function across forensically relevant timescales, with practical implications for the timing and evaluation of eyewitness identification evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.70204
Primary Topic
Memory Processes and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Temporal Dynamics of Eyewitness Memory: Evidence for a Multiphase Forgetting Curve From Minutes to Months

Stephen Farmer, Helen Kaye, Jim Turner
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Memory Processes and Influences
article

Temporal Dynamics of Eyewitness Memory: Evidence for a Multiphase Forgetting Curve From Minutes to Months

Stephen Farmer, Helen Kaye, Jim Turner
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Eyewitness testimony is central to criminal investigations, yet facial identification accuracy varies as a function of retention interval. This study examined eyewitness identification performance across delays ranging from 1 min to 90 days in two experiments. Participants viewed a target face and later completed lineup identification tasks following varying intervals. Results revealed a non‐monotonic, three‐phase forgetting trajectory: a rapid decline within the first hour, a period of relative stability between 1 h and 1 day and a more gradual decline extending to 90 days. The early and late phases were well described by logarithmic functions, whereas the intermediate phase showed a near‐zero gradient, indicating a temporary plateau in performance. The primary contribution of this work is a detailed characterisation of the shape of the forgetting function across forensically relevant timescales, with practical implications for the timing and evaluation of eyewitness identification evidence.

Applied Cognitive PsychologyVol. 40(3)
The Open University (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Memory Processes and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.