A hybrid type 1 trial of a digital behaviour change intervention for frailty prevention in community-dwelling older adults aged 60 years and older

AIMS: This hybrid type 1 randomised controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness and implementation of a digital behaviour change intervention (DBCI) designed to empower older adults (60+) who are nonfrail and community-dwelling to adopt activity, vaccination, optimising medication, interaction and socialisation, diet and nutrition (AVOID) behaviours to prevent frailty. METHODS: Sixty adults, from one South Australian local council, were randomised to receive the DBCI (n = 31) or wait (control; n = 29) for 6 months to receive limited DBCI access. Repeated-measures mixed models were used to assess between-group differences in changes in the primary outcome, the frailty index (FI), and the secondary outcome, quality-of-life (QoL; EQ-5D-5L) scores, from baseline to 6 months. Content analysis of survey and focus group data from the intervention group assessed technology acceptance, perceived knowledge and behaviour change. DBCI behaviour change techniques included baseline health and three-month behaviour change reports, education, a library of community resources, goal-setting and action planning and gamification and nudging. Participants in the intervention group received newsletters and were invited to face-to-face expert talks. RESULTS: The median age was 75.4 years, and 63.3% of participants were female. In the intervention group, the mean FI score decreased from 0.135 (SD 0.053) to 0.115 (SD 0.071) over 6 months, while in the control group it increased from 0.134 (SD 0.048) to 0.160 (SD 0.087). The intervention group had a mean FI change of -0.044 [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.076 to -0.012] and a mean QoL change of 0.032 (95% CI 0.016 to 0.058) compared with the control group. Qualitative feedback indicated that the DBCI was acceptable, improved knowledge and supported behaviour change across AVOID behaviours. CONCLUSION: A DBCI promoting the adoption of AVOID behaviours among nonfrail, community-dwelling older people is effective in preventing frailty and improving QoL when implemented. Solving technical barriers and incorporating intelligent technologies could enhance impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Age and Ageing
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afag120
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A hybrid type 1 trial of a digital behaviour change intervention for frailty prevention in community-dwelling older adults aged 60 years and older

Agathe Daria Jadczak, Renuka Visvanathan, Joanne Dollard, Ian Halkett et al.
Age and Ageing
Frailty in Older Adults
article

A hybrid type 1 trial of a digital behaviour change intervention for frailty prevention in community-dwelling older adults aged 60 years and older

Agathe Daria Jadczak, Renuka Visvanathan, Joanne Dollard, Ian Halkett, Mark Q Thompson, J Thomas, Sharanya Mahadavan, John Muscedere, Graeme Tucker, Lissy Oxford
article en

Abstract

AIMS: This hybrid type 1 randomised controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness and implementation of a digital behaviour change intervention (DBCI) designed to empower older adults (60+) who are nonfrail and community-dwelling to adopt activity, vaccination, optimising medication, interaction and socialisation, diet and nutrition (AVOID) behaviours to prevent frailty. METHODS: Sixty adults, from one South Australian local council, were randomised to receive the DBCI (n = 31) or wait (control; n = 29) for 6 months to receive limited DBCI access. Repeated-measures mixed models were used to assess between-group differences in changes in the primary outcome, the frailty index (FI), and the secondary outcome, quality-of-life (QoL; EQ-5D-5L) scores, from baseline to 6 months. Content analysis of survey and focus group data from the intervention group assessed technology acceptance, perceived knowledge and behaviour change. DBCI behaviour change techniques included baseline health and three-month behaviour change reports, education, a library of community resources, goal-setting and action planning and gamification and nudging. Participants in the intervention group received newsletters and were invited to face-to-face expert talks. RESULTS: The median age was 75.4 years, and 63.3% of participants were female. In the intervention group, the mean FI score decreased from 0.135 (SD 0.053) to 0.115 (SD 0.071) over 6 months, while in the control group it increased from 0.134 (SD 0.048) to 0.160 (SD 0.087). The intervention group had a mean FI change of -0.044 [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.076 to -0.012] and a mean QoL change of 0.032 (95% CI 0.016 to 0.058) compared with the control group. Qualitative feedback indicated that the DBCI was acceptable, improved knowledge and supported behaviour change across AVOID behaviours. CONCLUSION: A DBCI promoting the adoption of AVOID behaviours among nonfrail, community-dwelling older people is effective in preventing frailty and improving QoL when implemented. Solving technical barriers and incorporating intelligent technologies could enhance impact.

Age and AgeingVol. 55(5)
Charles Sturt University (AU), Queen's University (CA), Queen Elizabeth Hospital (AU), Canadian Respiratory Research Network (CA), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Hospital Research Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.