Clinical efficacy and safety of a spray formulation containing carvacrol and eugenol against Rhipicephalus linnaei and Ctenocephalides felis felis in artificially infested dogs
The control of ectoparasites in dogs is challenged by resistance and the environmental impacts of synthetic pesticides, driving the search for plant-based alternatives. This study evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of a spray formulation containing carvacrol (10%) and eugenol (10%) against experimental infestations by the tick Rhipicephalus linnaei and the flea Ctenocephalides felis felis in dogs. Sixteen Beagles were randomly allocated to a treated group (TG, n=8) and an untreated control group (CG, n=8). The animals were artificially infested on days -2, +5, and +12, and parasite counts were performed on days +2, +7, and +14. Efficacy was calculated as the percent reduction of arithmetic means relative to the CG. Safety was assessed through daily clinical examinations and hematological and biochemical analyses. The formulation achieved high initial therapeutic efficacy, with reductions of 96% for R. linnaei and 98% for C. felis felis on day +2, meeting reference efficacy thresholds for ectoparasiticides. On days +7 and +14, reductions were lower (49–56% for fleas and 11–49% for ticks) and, despite remaining statistically significant compared to controls, did not reach the levels required to claim residual efficacy. No local or systemic adverse events were observed, and laboratory parameters remained within reference ranges for the respective species, with no significant differences between groups (p > 0.05). The results demonstrate that the carvacrol and eugenol spray formulation is effective for the therapeutic control of tick and flea infestations in dogs, representing a promising plant-based alternative. • A carvacrol (10%) and eugenol (10%) spray formulation was evaluated in dogs • Efficacy exceeded 96% against R. linnaei and 98% against C. felis felis within 48 h • Residual efficacy against fleas remained statistically significant at 14 days • No local or systemic adverse events were observed in treated dogs • This botanical combination offers a safe, effective alternative for ectoparasite control
Authors
- Isabelle Vilela Bonfim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4290-2267)
- Ingrid Lins Raquel de Jesus (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2435-5098)
- Fábio Barbour Scott (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1683-8724)
- Brena Gava Guimarães (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3166-1605)
- Yara Peluso Cid (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0775-0704)
- Fernando Rocha Miranda (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2309-7231)
- M. P. da Silva
- Ygor Henrique da Silva (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6943-2528)
- Gabrielle de Lima Monzato
- Taynara Monsores e Silva
- Matheus Eduardo Costa da Silva
- Anna Julia Bessa Fernandes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8254-8157)
- Clara Rodrigues Dutra
- Diefrey Ribeiro Campos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5434-1463)
Institutions
- Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Veterinary Parasitology
- Published
- 2026-05-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2026.110793
- Primary Topic
- Vector-borne infectious diseases
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro