Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)-Based Greenhouse Gas Emission Estimation for Different Medical Waste Treatment Scenarios in Korea

This study aims to compare and analyze greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with various medical waste treatment methods, outsourced incineration and on-site treatment-by establishing three distinct scenarios in the context of increasing medical waste generation driven by Korea's transition into an aging society.As of 2024, approximately 97% of the medical waste generated in Seoul will be outsourced to specialized incineration facilities located in other regions, with transport distances ranging from 60 to 300 km.By contrast, on-site treatment involves the sterilization and shredding of medical waste using equipment installed in general hospitals, followed by incineration at municipal solid waste incineration facilities and ultimately landfilling of the resulting residues.The baseline scenario assumes that 100% of the medical waste is treated through outsourced incineration.Scenario 1 assumes 100% on-site treatment, whereas Scenario 2 assumes a combination of 70% on-site treatment and 30% recycling of low-risk infectious, recyclable plastic waste.Using a life cycle assessment approach, this study quantified GHG emissions for each scenario to provide fundamental data for improving medical waste management strategies in Korea.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Resources Recycling
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7844/kirr.2026.35.2.42
Primary Topic
Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)-Based Greenhouse Gas Emission Estimation for Different Medical Waste Treatment Scenarios in Korea

Hong-Yoon Kang, Jin‐Woo Kim, Cheol-Sun Lim, Yong-Woo Hwang et al.
Resources Recycling
Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
article

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)-Based Greenhouse Gas Emission Estimation for Different Medical Waste Treatment Scenarios in Korea

Hong-Yoon Kang, Jin‐Woo Kim, Cheol-Sun Lim, Yong-Woo Hwang, Jae-Seung Kim
article en

Abstract

This study aims to compare and analyze greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with various medical waste treatment methods, outsourced incineration and on-site treatment-by establishing three distinct scenarios in the context of increasing medical waste generation driven by Korea's transition into an aging society.As of 2024, approximately 97% of the medical waste generated in Seoul will be outsourced to specialized incineration facilities located in other regions, with transport distances ranging from 60 to 300 km.By contrast, on-site treatment involves the sterilization and shredding of medical waste using equipment installed in general hospitals, followed by incineration at municipal solid waste incineration facilities and ultimately landfilling of the resulting residues.The baseline scenario assumes that 100% of the medical waste is treated through outsourced incineration.Scenario 1 assumes 100% on-site treatment, whereas Scenario 2 assumes a combination of 70% on-site treatment and 30% recycling of low-risk infectious, recyclable plastic waste.Using a life cycle assessment approach, this study quantified GHG emissions for each scenario to provide fundamental data for improving medical waste management strategies in Korea.

Resources RecyclingVol. 35(2)
Inha University (KR), Institute for Biodiversity (DE)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.