Analysis of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes and expression of immune checkpoint proteins (PD-1 and PD-L1) in primary and persistent periapical lesions

INTRODUCTION: Persistent periapical lesions (PePL) represent a clinical challenge because of their inadequate response to conventional endodontic therapies. Studies indicate differences in immunoinflammatory mechanisms between primary periapical lesions (PrPL) and PePL but the findings remain conflicting. This study aimed to evaluate CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes and the expression of immune checkpoint proteins (PD-1 and PD-L1) in PrPL and PePL, correlating the findings with the intensity of the inflammatory infiltrate and pattern of the cystic epithelial lining. METHODS: Ten primary radicular cysts (PrRC), 10 persistent radicular cysts (PeRC), 10 primary periapical granulomas (PrPG), and 10 persistent periapical granulomas (PePG) were submitted to immunohistochemical analysis using anti-CD8, anti-CD4, anti-PD-1, and anti-PD-L1 antibodies. RESULTS: Higher median T lymphocyte counts were observed in PeRC when compared to the other groups, with a statistically significant difference in CD8+ T cells compared to PrPG (P < .05). Regarding PD-L1, PeRC exhibited higher median percentages of positivity in connective tissue and epithelial lining, which differed significantly from the other groups (P < .005). There were no statistically significant differences in the numbers of CD4+ or CD8+ T lymphocytes nor in the expression of PD-1 or PD-L1 according to morphological parameters (P > .05). Immunoexpression of PD-L1 and CD4+ T lymphocyte count showed a positive correlation in PrPL (r = .592; P < .005) and PePL (r = .532; P < .05). In the latter, PD-L1 and CD8+ T lymphocyte count were also positively correlated (r = .690; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest the involvement of PD-1 and PD-L1 in the regulation of immunoinflammatory responses in PrPL and PePL. These immune checkpoint proteins may be particularly important for the suppression of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte activities in the periapical lesions studied, contributing to their chronicity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Endodontics
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2026.04.015
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes and expression of immune checkpoint proteins (PD-1 and PD-L1) in primary and persistent periapical lesions

Robeci Alves Macêdo Filho, Wliana Pontes de Lima, Pollianna Muniz Alves, Camila Maria Belarmino dos Santos et al.
Journal of Endodontics
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

Analysis of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes and expression of immune checkpoint proteins (PD-1 and PD-L1) in primary and persistent periapical lesions

Robeci Alves Macêdo Filho, Wliana Pontes de Lima, Pollianna Muniz Alves, Camila Maria Belarmino dos Santos, Manuel Antonio Gordón-Núñez, João Augusto Vianna Goulart Filho, Cassiano Francisco Weege Nonaka
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Persistent periapical lesions (PePL) represent a clinical challenge because of their inadequate response to conventional endodontic therapies. Studies indicate differences in immunoinflammatory mechanisms between primary periapical lesions (PrPL) and PePL but the findings remain conflicting. This study aimed to evaluate CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes and the expression of immune checkpoint proteins (PD-1 and PD-L1) in PrPL and PePL, correlating the findings with the intensity of the inflammatory infiltrate and pattern of the cystic epithelial lining. METHODS: Ten primary radicular cysts (PrRC), 10 persistent radicular cysts (PeRC), 10 primary periapical granulomas (PrPG), and 10 persistent periapical granulomas (PePG) were submitted to immunohistochemical analysis using anti-CD8, anti-CD4, anti-PD-1, and anti-PD-L1 antibodies. RESULTS: Higher median T lymphocyte counts were observed in PeRC when compared to the other groups, with a statistically significant difference in CD8+ T cells compared to PrPG (P < .05). Regarding PD-L1, PeRC exhibited higher median percentages of positivity in connective tissue and epithelial lining, which differed significantly from the other groups (P < .005). There were no statistically significant differences in the numbers of CD4+ or CD8+ T lymphocytes nor in the expression of PD-1 or PD-L1 according to morphological parameters (P > .05). Immunoexpression of PD-L1 and CD4+ T lymphocyte count showed a positive correlation in PrPL (r = .592; P < .005) and PePL (r = .532; P < .05). In the latter, PD-L1 and CD8+ T lymphocyte count were also positively correlated (r = .690; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest the involvement of PD-1 and PD-L1 in the regulation of immunoinflammatory responses in PrPL and PePL. These immune checkpoint proteins may be particularly important for the suppression of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte activities in the periapical lesions studied, contributing to their chronicity.

Journal of Endodontics
Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (BR), Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.