Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Using the Labral Bridge Technique Reveals Excellent Outcomes at a Minimum Follow-up of 2 Years: A Retrospective Case Series

Background: Despite technical advancements, recurrent glenohumeral joint instability after surgical treatment is still a major issue. Challenging conventional arthroscopic Bankart repair, the labral bridge technique provides an even labral compression to the glenoid rim, potentially enabling anatomic healing and lasting stability. Purpose: To evaluate clinical outcomes after arthroscopic Bankart repair using the labral bridge technique at a short-term follow-up. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients aged 18 to 50 years with traumatic first-time or recurrent shoulder dislocation treated with the arthroscopic labral bridge technique and an early motion rehabilitation protocol were consecutively included. Exclusion criteria were concomitant fractures, bony defects >10%, multidirectional shoulder instability, previous shoulder surgery, epilepsy, or chronic alcohol or drug abuse. Postoperative shoulder stability was assessed using the Rowe score. Patient-reported outcome measures, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain were evaluated preoperatively and after a minimum of 2 years. Results: A total of 46 patients (mean age, 28.9 ± 9.0 years) were included. At the final follow-up (mean, 35.8 ± 10.3 months), 2 patients (4.3%) experienced a recurrent traumatic anterior dislocation. The Rowe score improved significantly with lasting stability compared to preoperative levels (mean, 93.0 ± 16.7 postoperatively vs 37.8 ± 15.2 preoperatively; P < .001). Except for a significant improvement in forward flexion by 10.5° ( P = .013), no differences in postoperative range of motion were observed compared to preoperative levels. The ASES score, SANE, and VAS for pain improved significantly compared to preoperative levels (all P < .001). The minimal clinically important difference was reached by 92.7% of patients for the Rowe score, 92.9% for the ASES score, 83.3% for the SANE, and 73.8% for the VAS for pain. The patient acceptable symptom state was achieved by 92.9% of patients for the ASES score, 83.3% for the SANE, and 97.6% for the VAS for pain. Conclusion: Arthroscopic Bankart repair with the labral bridge technique for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability demonstrates a low recurrent shoulder instability rate and significant improvements in clinical and functional outcomes at a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671261438108
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Using the Labral Bridge Technique Reveals Excellent Outcomes at a Minimum Follow-up of 2 Years: A Retrospective Case Series

Philipp R. Heuberer, Ulrich Lanz, Fabian M. Tomanek, Sebastian Conner-Rilk et al.
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Using the Labral Bridge Technique Reveals Excellent Outcomes at a Minimum Follow-up of 2 Years: A Retrospective Case Series

Philipp R. Heuberer, Ulrich Lanz, Fabian M. Tomanek, Sebastian Conner-Rilk, Jakob E. Schanda
article en

Abstract

Background: Despite technical advancements, recurrent glenohumeral joint instability after surgical treatment is still a major issue. Challenging conventional arthroscopic Bankart repair, the labral bridge technique provides an even labral compression to the glenoid rim, potentially enabling anatomic healing and lasting stability. Purpose: To evaluate clinical outcomes after arthroscopic Bankart repair using the labral bridge technique at a short-term follow-up. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients aged 18 to 50 years with traumatic first-time or recurrent shoulder dislocation treated with the arthroscopic labral bridge technique and an early motion rehabilitation protocol were consecutively included. Exclusion criteria were concomitant fractures, bony defects >10%, multidirectional shoulder instability, previous shoulder surgery, epilepsy, or chronic alcohol or drug abuse. Postoperative shoulder stability was assessed using the Rowe score. Patient-reported outcome measures, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain were evaluated preoperatively and after a minimum of 2 years. Results: A total of 46 patients (mean age, 28.9 ± 9.0 years) were included. At the final follow-up (mean, 35.8 ± 10.3 months), 2 patients (4.3%) experienced a recurrent traumatic anterior dislocation. The Rowe score improved significantly with lasting stability compared to preoperative levels (mean, 93.0 ± 16.7 postoperatively vs 37.8 ± 15.2 preoperatively; P < .001). Except for a significant improvement in forward flexion by 10.5° ( P = .013), no differences in postoperative range of motion were observed compared to preoperative levels. The ASES score, SANE, and VAS for pain improved significantly compared to preoperative levels (all P < .001). The minimal clinically important difference was reached by 92.7% of patients for the Rowe score, 92.9% for the ASES score, 83.3% for the SANE, and 73.8% for the VAS for pain. The patient acceptable symptom state was achieved by 92.9% of patients for the ASES score, 83.3% for the SANE, and 97.6% for the VAS for pain. Conclusion: Arthroscopic Bankart repair with the labral bridge technique for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability demonstrates a low recurrent shoulder instability rate and significant improvements in clinical and functional outcomes at a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports MedicineVol. 14(5)
Cornell University (US), Klinik Hietzing (AT), Unfallkrankenhaus Meidling (AT), Presbyterian Hospital (US), Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration (AT), Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.