Effectiveness of digital health interventions in reducing loneliness among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Loneliness affects 12% of older adults globally, with concerns exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. While digital health interventions (DHIs) show promise, evidence of their effectiveness remains mixed. METHODOLOGY: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted in the PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science and Embase databases (2010-25). Inclusion criteria were adults aged 60 years, with loneliness as the primary or secondary outcome. Study quality was assessed using GRADE and Cochrane risk of bias tools. Subgroup analyses explored intervention type, measurement scales, national development level, pandemic timing and some secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Seventeen studies (n = 2423) showed DHIs significantly reduced loneliness scores (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.39, 95% CI -0.77 to -0.01). Subgroup analyses revealed significant reductions for social cognitive training (SMD = -0.82, 95% CI -1.47 to -0.16). Greater effectiveness was observed in developed countries (SMD = -0.30, 95% CI: -0.51 to -0.09) and during the pandemic period (SMD = -0.54, 95% CI: -1.03 to -0.06). DHIs also improved mental health (SMD = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.12 to 1.84) and marginally reduced depressive symptoms (SMD = -0.73, 95% CI: -1.45 to 0.00). CONCLUSION: DHIs show promise in reducing loneliness scores among older adults, particularly through cognitive-focused interventions in supportive digital environments. However, the overall effect is modest and highly heterogeneous, with benefits that appear context-dependent and short-lived. Future research should prioritise standardised measurement, diverse populations and long-term follow-up to optimise DHI design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Age and Ageing
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afag122
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of digital health interventions in reducing loneliness among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Y M Li, Junjie Ren, Juan Qiu, Limin Huang et al.
Age and Ageing
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Effectiveness of digital health interventions in reducing loneliness among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Y M Li, Junjie Ren, Juan Qiu, Limin Huang, Jialu Cai, Xiaoming Li
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Loneliness affects 12% of older adults globally, with concerns exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. While digital health interventions (DHIs) show promise, evidence of their effectiveness remains mixed. METHODOLOGY: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted in the PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science and Embase databases (2010-25). Inclusion criteria were adults aged 60 years, with loneliness as the primary or secondary outcome. Study quality was assessed using GRADE and Cochrane risk of bias tools. Subgroup analyses explored intervention type, measurement scales, national development level, pandemic timing and some secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Seventeen studies (n = 2423) showed DHIs significantly reduced loneliness scores (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.39, 95% CI -0.77 to -0.01). Subgroup analyses revealed significant reductions for social cognitive training (SMD = -0.82, 95% CI -1.47 to -0.16). Greater effectiveness was observed in developed countries (SMD = -0.30, 95% CI: -0.51 to -0.09) and during the pandemic period (SMD = -0.54, 95% CI: -1.03 to -0.06). DHIs also improved mental health (SMD = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.12 to 1.84) and marginally reduced depressive symptoms (SMD = -0.73, 95% CI: -1.45 to 0.00). CONCLUSION: DHIs show promise in reducing loneliness scores among older adults, particularly through cognitive-focused interventions in supportive digital environments. However, the overall effect is modest and highly heterogeneous, with benefits that appear context-dependent and short-lived. Future research should prioritise standardised measurement, diverse populations and long-term follow-up to optimise DHI design.

Age and AgeingVol. 55(5)
Anhui Medical University (CN), Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.