Brassica biofumigation cover crops in US agroecosystems: A systematic review of research from 2014 to 2024

Abstract Biofumigation with brassica cover crops (BCCs) is gaining momentum in the United States as an ecologically sound alternative to chemical pest suppression in agricultural systems. This review critically evaluates the impacts of Brassica species on soil health, weed suppression, disease mitigation, and control of plant‐parasitic nematodes (PPNs) across US agroecosystems over the last decade (2014–2024). Synthesizing data from over 50 peer‐reviewed studies, we found that brassicas, particularly mustard ( Brassica juncea ), radish ( Raphanus sativus ), and canola ( Brassica napus ), exert a significant biofumigation effect due to the release of allelochemicals, notably isothiocyanates, during residue decomposition. BCCs exhibit mixed effects on soil physical and chemical health, with certain species, such as turnip ( Brassica rapa ) and mustard, alleviating soil compaction and improving organic carbon under specific conditions. In contrast, others, such as canola, may reduce soil water content or microbial diversity due to high biomass demand or the release of allelochemicals. While 87.5% of the studies observed disease suppression and 60% reported nematode control, weed suppression showed variable outcomes, depending on Brassica species and management practices. Mustard was notably effective in pathogen control, while daikon radish consistently suppressed soybean cyst and reniform nematodes. However, some Brassica species acted as hosts to certain nematodes under specific conditions, highlighting the complexity of plant‐nematode interactions. Additionally, limited data exist on long‐term soil structural and chemical changes, particularly under arid or saline conditions prevalent in the western United States. This review identifies critical research gaps, including the need for integrated, multi‐functional assessments; long‐term trials; and innovative tools such as spatial‐spectral sensing, modeling approaches, and microbial functional profiling. Future research should prioritize exploring brassica performance under abiotic stress, assessing region‐specific impacts, and developing decision‐support tools to optimize biofumigation practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agronomy Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70388
Primary Topic
Nematode management and characterization studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Brassica biofumigation cover crops in US agroecosystems: A systematic review of research from 2014 to 2024

Jemila Chellappa, Udayakumar Sekaran, Vigneshwaran Raja, Karthik Karuppanan et al.
Agronomy Journal
Nematode management and characterization studies
article

Brassica biofumigation cover crops in US agroecosystems: A systematic review of research from 2014 to 2024

Jemila Chellappa, Udayakumar Sekaran, Vigneshwaran Raja, Karthik Karuppanan, Joel Felix
article en

Abstract

Abstract Biofumigation with brassica cover crops (BCCs) is gaining momentum in the United States as an ecologically sound alternative to chemical pest suppression in agricultural systems. This review critically evaluates the impacts of Brassica species on soil health, weed suppression, disease mitigation, and control of plant‐parasitic nematodes (PPNs) across US agroecosystems over the last decade (2014–2024). Synthesizing data from over 50 peer‐reviewed studies, we found that brassicas, particularly mustard ( Brassica juncea ), radish ( Raphanus sativus ), and canola ( Brassica napus ), exert a significant biofumigation effect due to the release of allelochemicals, notably isothiocyanates, during residue decomposition. BCCs exhibit mixed effects on soil physical and chemical health, with certain species, such as turnip ( Brassica rapa ) and mustard, alleviating soil compaction and improving organic carbon under specific conditions. In contrast, others, such as canola, may reduce soil water content or microbial diversity due to high biomass demand or the release of allelochemicals. While 87.5% of the studies observed disease suppression and 60% reported nematode control, weed suppression showed variable outcomes, depending on Brassica species and management practices. Mustard was notably effective in pathogen control, while daikon radish consistently suppressed soybean cyst and reniform nematodes. However, some Brassica species acted as hosts to certain nematodes under specific conditions, highlighting the complexity of plant‐nematode interactions. Additionally, limited data exist on long‐term soil structural and chemical changes, particularly under arid or saline conditions prevalent in the western United States. This review identifies critical research gaps, including the need for integrated, multi‐functional assessments; long‐term trials; and innovative tools such as spatial‐spectral sensing, modeling approaches, and microbial functional profiling. Future research should prioritize exploring brassica performance under abiotic stress, assessing region‐specific impacts, and developing decision‐support tools to optimize biofumigation practices.

Agronomy JournalVol. 118(3)
Oregon State University (US), University of Idaho (US), College of Idaho (US)
Oregon Department of Agriculture
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Nematode management and characterization studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.