“A win-win situation for all:” A qualitative exploration of pharmacist and physiotherapist perspectives on a collaborative framework for improving equitable primary care for acute musculoskeletal injuries

Musculoskeletal injuries cause significant impairment in social and physical functioning and are a common reason patients access primary care. Many face barriers accessing timely care. To (1) identify whether collaborative practices exist between pharmacists and physiotherapists for managing acute musculoskeletal injuries and (2) assess the acceptability and feasibility of a collaborative framework to improve access in Nova Scotia, Canada. Qualitative descriptive research using focus groups. Focus groups were conducted with pharmacists and physiotherapists. The first round explored current practices and feasibility of collaboration. The second round refined ideas to support framework development. Transcripts were coded deductively based on the APEASE (Acceptability, Practicability, Effectiveness, Affordability, Side effects/safety, Equity) criteria and analyzed inductively to develop themes. A total of 5 pharmacists and 12 physiotherapists were interviewed. Participants were unaware of any formal collaboration. Participants were eager to collaborate but expressed unfamiliarity with each other’s scopes of practice and identified logistical barriers to collaboration. Anticipated benefits identified included: quicker access to care, reduced chronic pain, improved adherence, and fewer emergency department visits, potentially reducing healthcare costs. Participants had concerns about limited rural access and costs of private physiotherapy care. Key facilitators, barriers, and solutions to collaboration were identified. Concerns were raised around the cost of care, and areas where access may be limited, which need to be addressed to prevent further inequities. The results will guide the development of a pharmacist-physiotherapist collaborative practice framework for musculoskeletal injuries in primary care, which considers ways to improve equitable access to care. • Formal pharmacist-physiotherapist collaboration is absent in Nova Scotia • Pharmacists and physiotherapists expressed a need for collaboration in MSK care. • Collaboration may enhance patient health outcomes and timely access to care • Collaboration may promote equitable access to care, particularly in rural areas. • Lack of communication and resources were identified as barriers to collaboration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2026.103570
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“A win-win situation for all:” A qualitative exploration of pharmacist and physiotherapist perspectives on a collaborative framework for improving equitable primary care for acute musculoskeletal injuries

Sharon Skaling, A. R. Grant, Ripu Daman, Rebecca Moyer et al.
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

“A win-win situation for all:” A qualitative exploration of pharmacist and physiotherapist perspectives on a collaborative framework for improving equitable primary care for acute musculoskeletal injuries

Sharon Skaling, A. R. Grant, Ripu Daman, Rebecca Moyer, Jennifer E. Isenor, Stephen Richey, Andrea Bishop, Gwen Morse, Julianne MacCallum
article en

Abstract

Musculoskeletal injuries cause significant impairment in social and physical functioning and are a common reason patients access primary care. Many face barriers accessing timely care. To (1) identify whether collaborative practices exist between pharmacists and physiotherapists for managing acute musculoskeletal injuries and (2) assess the acceptability and feasibility of a collaborative framework to improve access in Nova Scotia, Canada. Qualitative descriptive research using focus groups. Focus groups were conducted with pharmacists and physiotherapists. The first round explored current practices and feasibility of collaboration. The second round refined ideas to support framework development. Transcripts were coded deductively based on the APEASE (Acceptability, Practicability, Effectiveness, Affordability, Side effects/safety, Equity) criteria and analyzed inductively to develop themes. A total of 5 pharmacists and 12 physiotherapists were interviewed. Participants were unaware of any formal collaboration. Participants were eager to collaborate but expressed unfamiliarity with each other’s scopes of practice and identified logistical barriers to collaboration. Anticipated benefits identified included: quicker access to care, reduced chronic pain, improved adherence, and fewer emergency department visits, potentially reducing healthcare costs. Participants had concerns about limited rural access and costs of private physiotherapy care. Key facilitators, barriers, and solutions to collaboration were identified. Concerns were raised around the cost of care, and areas where access may be limited, which need to be addressed to prevent further inequities. The results will guide the development of a pharmacist-physiotherapist collaborative practice framework for musculoskeletal injuries in primary care, which considers ways to improve equitable access to care. • Formal pharmacist-physiotherapist collaboration is absent in Nova Scotia • Pharmacists and physiotherapists expressed a need for collaboration in MSK care. • Collaboration may enhance patient health outcomes and timely access to care • Collaboration may promote equitable access to care, particularly in rural areas. • Lack of communication and resources were identified as barriers to collaboration.

Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
Dalhousie University (CA), California Maritime Academy (US), Nova Scotia Hospital (CA)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.