Vocal compensation to noise in long-finned pilot whales ( <i>Globicephala melas</i> )

Anthropogenic noise is considered a marine pollutant by the European Union and can impact marine animals in various ways. Noise that overlaps in time and frequency with animal communication signals can interfere with communication and thus impact ecological functions mediated by acoustic signals, depending on how animals compensate for increasing noise. Our study investigated Lombard responses in long-finned pilot whales using sound and movement recording tags in an area with high anthropogenic pressure, the Strait of Gibraltar. We tested if pilot whales increase their vocal amplitude in response to noise, and whether vocal compensation is signal or context specific. We analyzed 1336 calls from 18 individuals in small social groups of simultaneously tagged animals, allowing us to parse which individual emitted which call and how call output level depended on masking noise level. We found that pilot whales increase their call output level with 0.50±0.04 dB per 1 dB increase in noise level to partially compensate for the effects of masking noise. Call type significantly influenced the Lombard response magnitude, with vocal compensation ranging from 0.11 to 0.87 dB per 1 dB increase in noise level, whereas animals exhibited similar Lombard responses for different dive contexts (non-foraging, deep dive descent and ascent). Our results indicate that pilot whales only compensate partially for increased noise levels, and that Lombard response magnitude depends on signal type. This emphasizes the need for understanding the ecological consequences of communication disruptions to ensure sustainable management of human activities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.251217
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Marine animal studies overview
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
58.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vocal compensation to noise in long-finned pilot whales ( Globicephala melas )

Renaud de Stephanis, Peter L. Tyack, Ruth Esteban, Philippe Verborgh et al.
3 citations
Journal of Experimental Biology
Marine animal studies overview
58.59
article

Vocal compensation to noise in long-finned pilot whales ( Globicephala melas )

Renaud de Stephanis, Peter L. Tyack, Ruth Esteban, Philippe Verborgh, Pauline Gauffier, Nicholas B. W. Macfarlane, Frants H. Jensen, Milou Hegeman
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Anthropogenic noise is considered a marine pollutant by the European Union and can impact marine animals in various ways. Noise that overlaps in time and frequency with animal communication signals can interfere with communication and thus impact ecological functions mediated by acoustic signals, depending on how animals compensate for increasing noise. Our study investigated Lombard responses in long-finned pilot whales using sound and movement recording tags in an area with high anthropogenic pressure, the Strait of Gibraltar. We tested if pilot whales increase their vocal amplitude in response to noise, and whether vocal compensation is signal or context specific. We analyzed 1336 calls from 18 individuals in small social groups of simultaneously tagged animals, allowing us to parse which individual emitted which call and how call output level depended on masking noise level. We found that pilot whales increase their call output level with 0.50±0.04 dB per 1 dB increase in noise level to partially compensate for the effects of masking noise. Call type significantly influenced the Lombard response magnitude, with vocal compensation ranging from 0.11 to 0.87 dB per 1 dB increase in noise level, whereas animals exhibited similar Lombard responses for different dive contexts (non-foraging, deep dive descent and ascent). Our results indicate that pilot whales only compensate partially for increased noise levels, and that Lombard response magnitude depends on signal type. This emphasizes the need for understanding the ecological consequences of communication disruptions to ensure sustainable management of human activities.

Journal of Experimental BiologyVol. 229(9)
Linköping University (SE), Andrews University (US), Roskilde University (DK), University of St Andrews (GB), Aarhus University (DK), Madeira Tecnopolo (PT), Whale Museum (US), Instituto Español de Oceanografía (ES), International Union for Conservation of Nature (United States) (US), Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior (DE), Instituto de Información Científica y Tecnológica (CU), Instituto Volcanológico de Canarias (ES), Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (US), Syracuse University (US)
Office of Naval Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Marine animal studies overview
58.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.