Multi-decadal patterns in abundance and seasonal distribution of Hogchokers (Pleuronectiformes: Achiridae), an apparent trophic anomaly, in lower Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries

Abstract Objective We used data from a long-term trawl survey to describe multi-decadal variation in the spatial distribution and relative abundance of the Hogchoker Trinectes maculatus in Chesapeake Bay and its three southernmost tributaries in relation to abiotic factors for three different life stages. Additionally, we compared relative abundance of Hogchokers in Chesapeake Bay with that of other commonly captured species. Lastly, we described trophic interactions of Hogchokers as prey within the Chesapeake Bay food web. Methods We used 35 years of bottom trawl survey data from Chesapeake Bay and three of its southern tributaries from a stratified random sampling design that included fixed and random stations to estimate relative abundance of Hogchokers in the James, York, and Rappahannock rivers and the lower Chesapeake Bay. We used generalized additive models to examine life-stage-specific distribution in relation to abiotic variables and seasons. We evaluated the role of Hogchokers in the Chesapeake Bay food web through published and unpublished diet studies. Results From 1988 to 2022, more than 2,293,000 Hogchokers were captured. Abundance in the York River ranked first (1,124,978 individuals), followed by that in the James River (825,711), the Rappahannock River (307,022), and lastly the main stem of Virginia’s portion of Chesapeake Bay (36,016 individuals). Annual relative abundance varied by three orders of magnitude within Chesapeake Bay; even greater variability was observed in specific regions within the bay and tributaries. Indices of Hogchoker relative abundance showed nearly 100-fold differences among years in the James River, whereas abundance patterns in remaining sampling areas showed less dramatic variations. Bottom water temperature, depth, salinity, and dissolved oxygen explained most of the observed variation relative to abundance among the size-classes examined. Distribution patterns were related to fish size, with smaller individuals found in brackish–freshwater habitats, whereas larger Hogchokers resided in more saline habitats. The seasonal distribution of Hogchokers was life stage specific, with early juveniles occurring in the upper portions of tributaries in summer and winter and larger juveniles and mature individuals occurring in the tributaries in winter and throughout all regions in summer. Conclusions Hogchokers are widely distributed based on size, and their distribution is affected by water temperature, salinity, depth, and dissolved oxygen. Hogchokers consume benthic invertebrates, potentially forming an important link between benthic productivity and higher trophic levels, but investigations of potential fish predators revealed limited consumption of Hogchokers despite their high abundance. Thus, Hogchokers may represent a carbon and nutrient sink in Chesapeake Bay and other temperate estuaries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Marine and Coastal Fisheries
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mcfafs/vtag005
Primary Topic
Marine and fisheries research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-decadal patterns in abundance and seasonal distribution of Hogchokers (Pleuronectiformes: Achiridae), an apparent trophic anomaly, in lower Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries

Troy D. Tuckey, Thomas A. Munroe
Marine and Coastal Fisheries
Marine and fisheries research
article

Multi-decadal patterns in abundance and seasonal distribution of Hogchokers (Pleuronectiformes: Achiridae), an apparent trophic anomaly, in lower Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries

Troy D. Tuckey, Thomas A. Munroe
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective We used data from a long-term trawl survey to describe multi-decadal variation in the spatial distribution and relative abundance of the Hogchoker Trinectes maculatus in Chesapeake Bay and its three southernmost tributaries in relation to abiotic factors for three different life stages. Additionally, we compared relative abundance of Hogchokers in Chesapeake Bay with that of other commonly captured species. Lastly, we described trophic interactions of Hogchokers as prey within the Chesapeake Bay food web. Methods We used 35 years of bottom trawl survey data from Chesapeake Bay and three of its southern tributaries from a stratified random sampling design that included fixed and random stations to estimate relative abundance of Hogchokers in the James, York, and Rappahannock rivers and the lower Chesapeake Bay. We used generalized additive models to examine life-stage-specific distribution in relation to abiotic variables and seasons. We evaluated the role of Hogchokers in the Chesapeake Bay food web through published and unpublished diet studies. Results From 1988 to 2022, more than 2,293,000 Hogchokers were captured. Abundance in the York River ranked first (1,124,978 individuals), followed by that in the James River (825,711), the Rappahannock River (307,022), and lastly the main stem of Virginia’s portion of Chesapeake Bay (36,016 individuals). Annual relative abundance varied by three orders of magnitude within Chesapeake Bay; even greater variability was observed in specific regions within the bay and tributaries. Indices of Hogchoker relative abundance showed nearly 100-fold differences among years in the James River, whereas abundance patterns in remaining sampling areas showed less dramatic variations. Bottom water temperature, depth, salinity, and dissolved oxygen explained most of the observed variation relative to abundance among the size-classes examined. Distribution patterns were related to fish size, with smaller individuals found in brackish–freshwater habitats, whereas larger Hogchokers resided in more saline habitats. The seasonal distribution of Hogchokers was life stage specific, with early juveniles occurring in the upper portions of tributaries in summer and winter and larger juveniles and mature individuals occurring in the tributaries in winter and throughout all regions in summer. Conclusions Hogchokers are widely distributed based on size, and their distribution is affected by water temperature, salinity, depth, and dissolved oxygen. Hogchokers consume benthic invertebrates, potentially forming an important link between benthic productivity and higher trophic levels, but investigations of potential fish predators revealed limited consumption of Hogchokers despite their high abundance. Thus, Hogchokers may represent a carbon and nutrient sink in Chesapeake Bay and other temperate estuaries.

Marine and Coastal FisheriesVol. 18(3)
National Museum of Natural History (US), Virginia Sea Grant (US)
Virginia Marine Resources Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Marine and fisheries research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.