The possible city: On dismantling Infrastructure to make Interstice habitable for all life forms

Although the genealogy of the term ‘public space’ is relatively recent, its material form has deeper roots and can be read as part of what could be called a modern Euro-American mode of building cities. Drawing from Egin Isin’s work public space can be read as part of a genealogy of the city as a ‘machine of difference,’ laying out distinct figures of citizenship, founded on an analysis of their alterities. Here, I offer an update to Isin’s typology in the form of a ‘tale of two cities,’ one attempting to make it face the conditions of our urban present. The first I will call Infrastructure, the existent city at the end of the modern world: one that divides, spatializes, and segregates bodies and beings according to notions of hygiene and modernist governmentality. I exemplify through the historical treatment of pavements, rats, dogs and trees, as well as disabled people. I argue that this form of urban infrastructuration offers nothing more than a ‘conditional inclusion’ to humancentric welfare. The focus on devising infrastructural solutions (hard surfaces or similar brutal forms of urban emplacement) has contributed to new forms of othering, exposing a wide plurality of urban bodies to uninhabitable milieus, further eroding the welcoming and gathering functions of public space. The second city it’s called Interstice: the possible city yet to come, sadly visible because of as well as subjugated by Infrastructure. Intervening in this domain of infrastructural solutionism, I foreground activist, artistic and pedagogical projects where multispecies urban landscapes appear less as an infrastructure and more as interstices of urban habitability: where different forms of coexistence between human and non-human bodies can be explored and supported.