ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1377 REAL-WORLD AGREEMENT OF NIHSS SCORES BETWEEN PARAMEDICS AND STROKE PHYSICIANS IN SUSPECTED STROKE: SECONDARY ANALYSIS FROM THE PARANASPP TRIAL

Abstract Background and aims The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is widely used in-hospital but rarely applied prehospital. The ParaNASPP trial introduced paramedic-performed NIHSS, supported by structured training and a digital tool, for suspected stroke cases. This secondary analysis evaluated real-world agreement on NIHSS scores between paramedics and stroke physicians. Methods We analyzed patients from the stepped-wedge cluster-randomized ParaNASPP trial conducted in Oslo, Norway (2019–2021) who had both a prehospital and a NIHSS score at hospital arrival. Agreement in total scores was assessed using Bland–Altman analysis, Cohen’s kappa for dichotomized NIHSS (0–5 vs. ≥6), and weighted kappa for individual items. Limits of agreement (LoA) were interpreted using a predefined four-grade scale (A–D), where grades A–C are considered acceptable. Sensitivity analyses examined whether agreement varied by time interval (≤30, 31–60, > 60 minutes. Results 443 patients were included for analysis (median age 74 years, 45% female). Mean difference in total scores was 0.76 points; LoA ranged from –5.90 to +7.42 (Grade B). Very good interrater reliability was observed for dichotomized categories (κ = 0.87). Weighted kappa for individual items ranged from 0.90 to 0.98, strongest for consciousness, facial palsy, and motor function, weakest for ataxia, sensory, and dysarthria. No systematic differences were observed across time intervals. Conclusions Paramedics trained and supported by a digital tool achieved acceptable agreement with stroke physicians in NIHSS scoring in a real-life setting. Although differences likely reflect interrater variability rather than elapsed time, they remained within clinically acceptable thresholds for prehospital decision-making. Conflict of interest Helge F. Bugge: nothing to disclose, Maren R. Hov: nothing to disclose, Else C. Sandset: nothing to disclose, Mona Guterud:nothing to disclose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.093
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1377 REAL-WORLD AGREEMENT OF NIHSS SCORES BETWEEN PARAMEDICS AND STROKE PHYSICIANS IN SUSPECTED STROKE: SECONDARY ANALYSIS FROM THE PARANASPP TRIAL

Maren Ranhoff Hov, Helge Fagerheim Bugge, Mona Guterud, Else Charlotte Sandset
European Stroke Journal
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1377 REAL-WORLD AGREEMENT OF NIHSS SCORES BETWEEN PARAMEDICS AND STROKE PHYSICIANS IN SUSPECTED STROKE: SECONDARY ANALYSIS FROM THE PARANASPP TRIAL

Maren Ranhoff Hov, Helge Fagerheim Bugge, Mona Guterud, Else Charlotte Sandset
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is widely used in-hospital but rarely applied prehospital. The ParaNASPP trial introduced paramedic-performed NIHSS, supported by structured training and a digital tool, for suspected stroke cases. This secondary analysis evaluated real-world agreement on NIHSS scores between paramedics and stroke physicians. Methods We analyzed patients from the stepped-wedge cluster-randomized ParaNASPP trial conducted in Oslo, Norway (2019–2021) who had both a prehospital and a NIHSS score at hospital arrival. Agreement in total scores was assessed using Bland–Altman analysis, Cohen’s kappa for dichotomized NIHSS (0–5 vs. ≥6), and weighted kappa for individual items. Limits of agreement (LoA) were interpreted using a predefined four-grade scale (A–D), where grades A–C are considered acceptable. Sensitivity analyses examined whether agreement varied by time interval (≤30, 31–60, > 60 minutes. Results 443 patients were included for analysis (median age 74 years, 45% female). Mean difference in total scores was 0.76 points; LoA ranged from –5.90 to +7.42 (Grade B). Very good interrater reliability was observed for dichotomized categories (κ = 0.87). Weighted kappa for individual items ranged from 0.90 to 0.98, strongest for consciousness, facial palsy, and motor function, weakest for ataxia, sensory, and dysarthria. No systematic differences were observed across time intervals. Conclusions Paramedics trained and supported by a digital tool achieved acceptable agreement with stroke physicians in NIHSS scoring in a real-life setting. Although differences likely reflect interrater variability rather than elapsed time, they remained within clinically acceptable thresholds for prehospital decision-making. Conflict of interest Helge F. Bugge: nothing to disclose, Maren R. Hov: nothing to disclose, Else C. Sandset: nothing to disclose, Mona Guterud:nothing to disclose.

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Oslo University Hospital (NO), OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), University of Oslo (NO), Stiftelsen Norsk Luftambulanse (NO), Metropolitan University (BD), Universidad Metropolitana (PR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.