ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2296 DIAGNOSTIC DISCREPANCIES IN STROKE DIAGNOSTICS: AN AUTOPSY-BASED REVIEW

Abstract Background and aims Despite major advances in stroke diagnosis, autopsy studies continue to demonstrate discrepancies between premortem clinical diagnoses and postmortem findings. Accurate determination of the cause of death is essential for the development of stroke care and treatment. This review focuses on the diagnostic value of autopsy in stroke-related deaths by examining the concordance between clinical diagnoses and neuropathological findings. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Eligible studies from 1985 onwards reported original autopsy findings and compared them with premortem clinical stroke diagnoses. Study selection and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers using Covidence. Extracted data included study characteristics, sample size, autopsy rates, and reported diagnostic discrepancies. Results Of 291 identified studies, 10 studies were included, comprising 1642 patients who died following a clinical stroke diagnosis, of whom 1068 patients underwent autopsy. Misclassification or undiagnosed stroke aetiology or stroke-related causes of death was reported in 6 studies. Missed intracranial infarcts or hemorrhagic transformation was identified in 5 studies. Clinically unrecognized systemic complications, most commonly pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, sepsis, and occult malignancy were reported in 7 studies. Inaccuracies in cause-of-death registration were described in 2 studies, and imaging–pathology discrepancies were reported in 4 studies. Conclusions Autopsy remains a valuable tool for diagnostic clarification in stroke by identifying clinically unrecognized pathology and correcting misclassified causes of death, despite advances in neuroimaging and clinical assessment. Autopsy should be considered if the cause of death and stroke aetiology are not certain or is atypical. Conflict of interest Nothing to disclose

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.1788
Primary Topic
Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2296 DIAGNOSTIC DISCREPANCIES IN STROKE DIAGNOSTICS: AN AUTOPSY-BASED REVIEW

Helle Klingenberg Iversen, Hacer Cetinalp, Anders West, Bahar Ghouds
European Stroke Journal
Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2296 DIAGNOSTIC DISCREPANCIES IN STROKE DIAGNOSTICS: AN AUTOPSY-BASED REVIEW

Helle Klingenberg Iversen, Hacer Cetinalp, Anders West, Bahar Ghouds
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Despite major advances in stroke diagnosis, autopsy studies continue to demonstrate discrepancies between premortem clinical diagnoses and postmortem findings. Accurate determination of the cause of death is essential for the development of stroke care and treatment. This review focuses on the diagnostic value of autopsy in stroke-related deaths by examining the concordance between clinical diagnoses and neuropathological findings. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Eligible studies from 1985 onwards reported original autopsy findings and compared them with premortem clinical stroke diagnoses. Study selection and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers using Covidence. Extracted data included study characteristics, sample size, autopsy rates, and reported diagnostic discrepancies. Results Of 291 identified studies, 10 studies were included, comprising 1642 patients who died following a clinical stroke diagnosis, of whom 1068 patients underwent autopsy. Misclassification or undiagnosed stroke aetiology or stroke-related causes of death was reported in 6 studies. Missed intracranial infarcts or hemorrhagic transformation was identified in 5 studies. Clinically unrecognized systemic complications, most commonly pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, sepsis, and occult malignancy were reported in 7 studies. Inaccuracies in cause-of-death registration were described in 2 studies, and imaging–pathology discrepancies were reported in 4 studies. Conclusions Autopsy remains a valuable tool for diagnostic clarification in stroke by identifying clinically unrecognized pathology and correcting misclassified causes of death, despite advances in neuroimaging and clinical assessment. Autopsy should be considered if the cause of death and stroke aetiology are not certain or is atypical. Conflict of interest Nothing to disclose

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.