Multidisciplinary team care in prostate cancer: From decision-making to value-based management

Multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussions are increasingly recognized as a cornerstone of high-quality prostate cancer (PCa) management. This mini-review explores the growing evidence supporting MDT implementation in PCa care pathways, its impact on treatment planning, and evolving tools to streamline decision-making. Evidence from recent cohort studies and implementation research suggests improved guideline concordance, reduced rates of overtreatment, and enhanced patient engagement when multidisciplinary evaluation is applied, particularly in complex cases or cases where management is uncertain. Future directions include evaluating structured decision-support tools and case complexity scoring systems. The integration of MDTs is a scalable model that should be adapted across healthcare settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Urology
Published
2026-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20514158261438765
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multidisciplinary team care in prostate cancer: From decision-making to value-based management

Lara Rodríguez‐Sánchez, Maurice Anidjar, Christian Schwentner, José Antonio Herranz Yagüe et al.
Journal of Clinical Urology
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Multidisciplinary team care in prostate cancer: From decision-making to value-based management

Lara Rodríguez‐Sánchez, Maurice Anidjar, Christian Schwentner, José Antonio Herranz Yagüe, Rafael Sanchez‐Salas, Kara Watts, Claudia Covarrubias, Rocio Roldan-Testillano, Hashim U Ahmed
article en

Abstract

Multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussions are increasingly recognized as a cornerstone of high-quality prostate cancer (PCa) management. This mini-review explores the growing evidence supporting MDT implementation in PCa care pathways, its impact on treatment planning, and evolving tools to streamline decision-making. Evidence from recent cohort studies and implementation research suggests improved guideline concordance, reduced rates of overtreatment, and enhanced patient engagement when multidisciplinary evaluation is applied, particularly in complex cases or cases where management is uncertain. Future directions include evaluating structured decision-support tools and case complexity scoring systems. The integration of MDTs is a scalable model that should be adapted across healthcare settings.

Journal of Clinical Urology
Montefiore Medical Center (US), McGill University Health Centre (CA), Institute Mutualiste Montsouris (FR), Prostate Cancer Research (GB), Montefiore Hospital (GB), Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada (ES), Diakonie-Klinikum Stuttgart (DE), Imperial College London (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.