ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A988 SEX DIFFERENCES IN UTILIZATION OF HYPERCOAGULABILITY TESTING AFTER ISCHEMIC STROKE: A POPULATION-BASED STUDY

Abstract Background and aims Hypercoagulability can be a cause of ischemic stroke, particularly in cases without another clear etiology. There are limited guidelines to standardize the use of hypercoagulable testing in stroke workups. This introduces potential variability and bias in patient selection for testing. This study seeks to examine if sex differences exist in the utilization of hypercoagulable testing in a population-based study of patients following an ischemic stroke. Methods We ascertained all ischemic strokes in the 5-county area surrounding a Midwestern US city in calendar year 2020. Cases were identified by ICD codes, abstracted by study nurses, and physician adjudicated. When hypercoagulable testing was noted, testing details were physician confirmed prior to statistical analysis. To assess possible sex differences, we used Chi-square tests for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables. Logistic regression models were used to determine whether sex differences were present after adjusting for age, race, stroke subtype, and prespecified comorbidities including hypertension, patent foramen ovale, and drug use. Results Among 3,288 ischemic strokes in this population, 202 (6%) underwent hypercoagulability testing. Of those tested, 58% were female, with a younger median age than males (49 vs. 55 years, p=0.02). Logistic regression demonstrated that women were more likely to undergo testing than men (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.09–2.04, p=0.01), independent of age, race, stroke subtype. Conclusions Women in our study were significantly more likely to undergo hypercoagulability testing. Future research is needed to determine whether sex-based differences in testing lead to differences in diagnostic yield, management decisions, or outcomes. Conflict of interest Kaylea Feldman: nothing to disclose. GCNKSS study team: the GCNKSS is supported by funding from the NIH NINDS (R01NS30678). Robert Stanton: nothing to disclose. Table 1 - belongs to Results Table 2 - belongs to Results Table 3 - belongs to Results

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.504
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A988 SEX DIFFERENCES IN UTILIZATION OF HYPERCOAGULABILITY TESTING AFTER ISCHEMIC STROKE: A POPULATION-BASED STUDY

Robert Stanton, Gcnkss Study Team, Kaylea Feldman
European Stroke Journal
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A988 SEX DIFFERENCES IN UTILIZATION OF HYPERCOAGULABILITY TESTING AFTER ISCHEMIC STROKE: A POPULATION-BASED STUDY

Robert Stanton, Gcnkss Study Team, Kaylea Feldman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Hypercoagulability can be a cause of ischemic stroke, particularly in cases without another clear etiology. There are limited guidelines to standardize the use of hypercoagulable testing in stroke workups. This introduces potential variability and bias in patient selection for testing. This study seeks to examine if sex differences exist in the utilization of hypercoagulable testing in a population-based study of patients following an ischemic stroke. Methods We ascertained all ischemic strokes in the 5-county area surrounding a Midwestern US city in calendar year 2020. Cases were identified by ICD codes, abstracted by study nurses, and physician adjudicated. When hypercoagulable testing was noted, testing details were physician confirmed prior to statistical analysis. To assess possible sex differences, we used Chi-square tests for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables. Logistic regression models were used to determine whether sex differences were present after adjusting for age, race, stroke subtype, and prespecified comorbidities including hypertension, patent foramen ovale, and drug use. Results Among 3,288 ischemic strokes in this population, 202 (6%) underwent hypercoagulability testing. Of those tested, 58% were female, with a younger median age than males (49 vs. 55 years, p=0.02). Logistic regression demonstrated that women were more likely to undergo testing than men (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.09–2.04, p=0.01), independent of age, race, stroke subtype. Conclusions Women in our study were significantly more likely to undergo hypercoagulability testing. Future research is needed to determine whether sex-based differences in testing lead to differences in diagnostic yield, management decisions, or outcomes. Conflict of interest Kaylea Feldman: nothing to disclose. GCNKSS study team: the GCNKSS is supported by funding from the NIH NINDS (R01NS30678). Robert Stanton: nothing to disclose. Table 1 - belongs to Results Table 2 - belongs to Results Table 3 - belongs to Results

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
University of Cincinnati (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A988 SEX DIFFERENCES IN UTILIZATION OF HYPERCOAGULABILITY TESTING AFTER ISCHEMIC STROKE: A POPULATION-BASED STUDY — Robert Stanton, Gcnkss Study Team, et al. · European Stroke Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS